From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id wHJ7H+Hg9V/ERwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 16:10:09 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id MBBUG+Hg9V9uMAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 16:10:09 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 290E694030E for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 16:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33260 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxBNw-0002tE-4A for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 11:10:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48488) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxBNW-0002sk-0F for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 11:09:42 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1]:40739) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxBNT-0004bh-TR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 11:09:41 -0500 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9vSw0r8Wz1rxMG; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:09:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9vSw0QlKz1sFWw; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:09:36 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z_c7eR5GI5oR; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:09:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from hermia.goebel-consult.de (ppp-188-174-53-237.dynamic.mnet-online.de [188.174.53.237]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:09:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from thisbe.goebel-consult.de (hermia.goebel-consult.de [192.168.110.7]) by hermia.goebel-consult.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F0360200; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:09:32 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [RFC] Improve Python package quality To: Vincent Legoll , Lars-Dominik Braun References: From: Hartmut Goebel Organization: crazy-compilers.com Message-ID: <0f51ed49-2a12-ca03-f4b1-f59b45629ec9@crazy-compilers.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:09:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: de-DE Received-SPF: none client-ip=2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1; envelope-from=h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com; helo=mail-out.m-online.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.34 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 290E694030E X-Spam-Score: -2.34 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: tLPb/RYojz3C Am 05.01.21 um 11:48 schrieb Vincent Legoll: > That is better, but the separate file would allow to have proper > syntax highlighting, allow linting/pep8'ing, etc. Probably not worth the effort for trying to put this into a separate file. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |