From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id yMk2GQNTVWQwCQEASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 May 2023 21:03:31 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id IF/5GANTVWQy5QAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 May 2023 21:03:31 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1302D139E4 for ; Fri, 5 May 2023 21:03:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pv0ht-00084d-Hc; Fri, 05 May 2023 15:03:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pv0hs-00084V-0b for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 May 2023 15:03:04 -0400 Received: from mx2.dismail.de ([159.69.191.136]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pv0hp-00070H-IR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 May 2023 15:03:03 -0400 Received: from mx2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c96da036; Fri, 5 May 2023 21:02:56 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:subject:to:cc:in-reply-to:references; s=20190914; bh=cHn3ewXrwKcMJ5bWJOZLJXLt9ft/Y0nJ/i8tU72icWM=; b=dR+Dg7T0BMlx QTjbgc4UPg2EOLPhtOxLJOUtd+dQc0xR5ASuOxj+vKWkiDjRKChrAQyWyeJKq2Eg oQdwBB7mDiM8KkVsjb1W2z2oXpqBSnpKi1feA7VKCuZxllrlODELsRPYB5nktqj+ V94w3QxI38/AQcvFACEEYM8OfRUTR1dGBMqYVRjqIvqRJmcZt50X7deHqCfhAkbv PQXHrAGfpwruCiTPUN0hLkd7XFnSe5KSiCiaCZlQF/FCCZ/ciYQyKxRYCd2Lbd4H PixQTcLCg6c8pur0hscDgbAUuClXGh4lC/1S93TYwjRBSUw0g2UR4c1dhqj7n7mY kel4D9V+WQ== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 48dda43d; Fri, 5 May 2023 21:02:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 2af932c0; Fri, 5 May 2023 21:02:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 2c6f4086 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 5 May 2023 21:02:54 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 19:02:53 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.17.0 From: jbranso@dismail.de Message-ID: <0e53cab97ee5496ed0aa48f94faea644@dismail.de> Subject: Re: What's needed to get things building for i586-gnu (the hurd) post core-updates? To: "Christopher Baines" , "Josselin Poiret" Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87354a3jrs.fsf@cbaines.net> References: <87354a3jrs.fsf@cbaines.net> <877ctm3lnm.fsf@cbaines.net> <87o7myc0cy.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=159.69.191.136; envelope-from=jbranso@dismail.de; helo=mx2.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1683313411; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=NMj4z/cAkBOrJvSbQR1G1BNbo74lnwW4pmou5NaBDm5W8S+8IUuKich6JqLhS6v8Amox/p Bgbwmqj5QKf11uAUHjpWLU4jNxZpVeP4Q866gDuMLfFElJtgScIOYZqVsXVD2Alt0cymNG KzpNcUPTAncg/aPoty4INVcAMG/ORTOBvdsipeK5lLf5ZFVEHXBfQORcdTFW+vFL8Z6Xgt X5lKPXM/R7CD6ebE9CQ73j6ETZkwyElZD1iD8uMO186bKMSohAUP6tyqykv2TVY5Gxwm6F qwzgrF23/2zS+fydfZxubm8AyUEIhvgRoE8j9yHc4jC8rKnoHLYi0UApU2c1UQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=dR+Dg7T0; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1683313411; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=cHn3ewXrwKcMJ5bWJOZLJXLt9ft/Y0nJ/i8tU72icWM=; b=Q0lt4aoy6/8YiY3uSpSqn+jvx/jEZ/do+PEbj1RUvUor1cUH+LUQxLq162zmBOujOkZ5lg g1Vo20a/gNrQYZ1KP2T176eyYHdYkn/F2LruHSc6BOW1svM27jeHSQReVRuX1conGqpyPn p6FgtkschbJbjXujzzOpBrM+H0SHaC88OT52pxINAdrNi5K2ejjFCQy1hsPo8nP5EQF2xi +4VMwBUtgZyh3j+cF8jevb46Vzk7woUoYiJulxAnTI4i5ZBGTc65ITtQOVY8v57L6xysdm LI5lGn4D1Yi6ggSfBIM4NEQPdiDweGkoiKT8HicFgp7RtQOwh/dHerKzRM+MBA== X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -10.71 X-Spam-Score: -10.71 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1302D139E4 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=dR+Dg7T0; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-TUID: wm3n7sgkiDbt May 5, 2023 11:02 AM, "Christopher Baines" wrote: > Josselin Poiret writes: >=20 >>=20Christopher Baines writes: >>> I think the use of coreutils-boot0 in the source for gcc-boot0 is a >>> problematic change introduced in core-updates [2], at least >>> coreutils-boot0 fails to build. >>=20 >>=20Just to recap, as you mentioned on IRC, the coreutils configure phas= e >> seems to miss hurd.h, even though it is included in the bootstrap glib= c. >> It might be due to the coreutils upgrade, since I don't see what else >> could've changed this derivation. I don't have a childhurd at the >> moment (because a cross-compiled Hurd fails to run), so I can't really >> test native compilation as above :( >=20 >=20I think the first bit to look at here is not that coreutils-boot0 is > failing, but why it's started being used, because I'm not even sure > about that. Fun fact of the day, the Debian GNU/Hurd is starting to build 64-bit packages: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2023-05/msg00073.html