From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add lrzip. Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 19:46:07 +0200 Message-ID: <0b18578bf0d0beac1bb93f6cb857a067@tobias.gr> References: <20160720225413.2903-1-me@tobias.gr> <20160721002436.13651c1f@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36182) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQI37-0004JF-Et for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:46:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQI31-0000Vk-Gp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:46:16 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:50182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQI31-0000VQ-A7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:46:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160721002436.13651c1f@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Eric Bavier Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Eric, On 2016-07-21 07:24, Eric Bavier wrote: > The license should probably be "(list license:gpl3+ > license:public-domain)" since there is at least one file, md5.c, Thanks. That comma in ‘either version 3,’ threw off my simplistic grepping for ‘version n of the Licence’. Which prompts me to wonder, not for the first time: is there a less tedious and more reliable way to do this, besides ‘just ask Debian’? Kind regards, T G-R