From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Robert Vollmert <rob@vllmrt.net>
Subject: bug#36084: not really fixed?
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 16:13:59 +0200
Message-ID: <0391998F-36A9-48D8-8DE9-FE4997E513C3@vllmrt.net>
References: <4CEAB7EC-5859-4915-B381-C0AFFD93ABC5@vllmrt.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36818)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hnkhz-0000TI-Ud
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 10:15:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hnkhy-0001wv-S8
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 10:15:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43954)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hnkhy-0001wr-Oh
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 10:15:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hnkhy-0006dl-I7
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 10:15:02 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4CEAB7EC-5859-4915-B381-C0AFFD93ABC5@vllmrt.net>
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36084.B36084.156337285425452@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: 36084@debbugs.gnu.org

It seems the two clock packages are still subtly different, apparently
due to the tested variant pulling in a dependency on the test libraries.

Compare https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D36705.

Configuring tasty-hspec-1.1.5.1...
Warning:
    This package indirectly depends on multiple versions of the same =
package. This is very likely to cause a compile failure.
      package hspec-core (hspec-core-2.5.5-H06vLnMfEeIEsZFdji6h0O) =
requires clock-0.7.2-9qwmBbNbGzEOSffjlyarp
      package tasty (tasty-1.1.0.3-I8Vu9v0lHj8Jlg3jpKXavp) requires =
clock-0.7.2-Cf9UTsaN2AjEpBnoMpmgkU

It=E2=80=99s possible that this warning is really just a warning, and =
that there=E2=80=99s
no real problem here because the packages are really the same, but=E2=80=A6=
 I
don=E2=80=99t like it.