From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Raghav Gururajan Subject: bug#36634: Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 23:47:05 -0400 Message-ID: <024c3fdf57fa1cc35602868f71c55ebafd288293.camel@disroot.org> References: <255adc32694ef0c22fb789b1eea66a243cffb649.camel@disroot.org> <2427363bc3661f61734c5d908e5fcb0f57ab9ebc.camel@disroot.org> <1564083383.28412.1@submission.tobias.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-3aVQKj0HXMmG2xkeDp0j" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59001) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqrD9-0004NY-Dy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 23:48:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqrD8-0006fG-F3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 23:48:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60077) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqrD7-0006dk-Tp for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 23:48:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqrD7-0004l0-QI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 23:48:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1564083383.28412.1@submission.tobias.gr> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: 36634@debbugs.gnu.org --=-3aVQKj0HXMmG2xkeDp0j Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > I will do so swiftly since I updated libvirt to the 'broken' version=20 > (although I never had any troubles like yours). Thank you for=20 > reporting this upstream. About that, it appears I misunderstood the patch. That recent build was not to fix the bug I reported. Anyway, I have been told by one of the libvirt maintainers (pavel) that they are working on a fix for the bug I reported. So once I come to know about the new patch, I will update you and this mail list. :) > A personal note: I find this new wave of 'ATTENTION REQUIRED' > messages=20 > quite the opposite of motivating and pleasant. I'm honestly not > sure=20 > what result you expect from them. I fear it may backfire. Yeah, sorry about that. It was not intentional. I thought that sending replies directly to `#bug@debbugs.gnu.org` will not use the subject line, so just went with something top of my head. I will defer to do this, moving forward. :) Regards, RG. --=-3aVQKj0HXMmG2xkeDp0j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEamFiplxUWgy2NgJiorDiYAVcMdsFAl06d7kACgkQorDiYAVc Mdulfwf/Vg8YY8rZtATFZtzXIM1EGaRwpb8fHvfJmwL5ZVHQuM/J973tGubt/yKr e8fzAVxM3Ef4iOzGplPF9TWiRUehoeV2UZ9AGQa3AsyWD3YbuRCnIn9y6i3yv03Z WI4x2xmKdba/OfC3nlLxn0BixL1oKyqkg5fUUYhDCUD7+SzLKMiZNALbBFRV0MtS npO4Js0fM1tN9w8gv0POJQlwMBvPT0Rq72EWffIYWE3CBZQrtgLyjl99AHMqAd6K gdtkbZLDk864+bq71iLWsZfSU9lwRdc6FgBHhwiaYyNKpHX5eXGbaK9IR60uEciD JQY+/6cdcloowAc6c9V5Nb7F8YQlHg== =vWfp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-3aVQKj0HXMmG2xkeDp0j--