Agreed :)

Le 4 mai 2021 05:08:24 GMT-04:00, "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org> a écrit :
>Hi!
>
>guix-commits@gnu.org skribis:
>
>> commit 0f583f60f882d74f4cf2332c85343a2db67410c7
>> Author: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
>> AuthorDate: Sat May 1 22:35:09 2021 -0400
>>
>>     doc: Update to cover for an additional OpenPGP signing key.
>>     
>>     The upcoming 1.3.0 release will be signed with my OpenPGP key;
>subsequent
>>     releases may also be.
>>     
>>     * doc/guix.texi (OPENPGP-SIGNING-KEY-ID,
>OPENPGP-SIGNING-KEY-URL): Rename to...
>>     (OPENPGP-SIGNING-KEY-ID-1, OPENPGP-SIGNING-KEY-URL-1): ... these,
>>     respectively.
>>     (OPENPGP-SIGNING-KEY-ID-2, OPENPGP-SIGNING-KEY-URL-2): New
>variables.
>>     (Binary Installation): Adjust to cover for the new key.
>>     (USB Stick and DVD Installation): Likewise.
>>     (Invoking guix refresh): Adjust accordingly.
>
>No big deal but perhaps it would be enough to keep a single key in the
>manual since we know which key is going to be used for this release.
>
>That would avoid extra work for our translation maester, and it would
>make sure we don’t endlessly accumulate keys in there as release
>responsibilities rotate.  WDYT?
>
>Thanks,
>Ludo’.