On January 6, 2025 11:29:21 PM GMT+01:00, "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
Hello,
As proposed before, here’s a reworked version based on v5. The intent
is to keep the spirit and process unchanged compared to v5, while making
the document a bit more concise (239 lines, v5 was 322), improving
consistency for key words, hopefully improving wording, fixing
grammatical issues, and adding Markdown ornaments where appropriate.
Notable changes:
• Instead of “supporter” and “co-supporter”, I propose “author(s)” and
“supporter(s)” (there must be at least one supporter).
• Explicitly state the license of RFCs (CC-BY-SA or GFDL).
• Clarify that the deliberation period lasts exactly 14 days (was “up
to 14 days” in one place, “14 days” in another).
• Consistently name the different periods.
• Remove mention of the ‘withdrawn/’ directory: it’s redundant with
the ‘status’ header.
• Clarify what to do with “deprecated” RFCs.
• Clarify headers of this RFC.
• Clarify that this is not just for technical changes.
I can proofread and possibly propose minor tweaks the template
afterwards.
Thoughts?
Ludo’.