From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44457) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9cMQ-0005Ey-O9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:38:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9cMM-0000bd-QT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:38:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35901) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9cMM-0000bV-LP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:38:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e9cMM-0004lq-7V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:38:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#28830] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-ggtags. Resent-Message-ID: References: <87o9pa3xti.fsf@gmail.com> <20171016065131.4e838899@cbaines.net> <87zi8r1jfk.fsf@gmail.com> <20171031082218.2a45cfab@cbaines.net> From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Message-ID: <00822521-d167-497d-62e1-0a567271cf7b@tobias.gr> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 20:39:54 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171031082218.2a45cfab@cbaines.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0885Uif8Es6EH5c1wMitIJcamgc3QxOk2" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: mail@cbaines.net, go.wigust@gmail.com Cc: 28830@debbugs.gnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --0885Uif8Es6EH5c1wMitIJcamgc3QxOk2 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="6GcbHbi0hqh992PDGSoxCDv6S1fVNpIRi"; protected-headers="v1" From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: mail@cbaines.net, go.wigust@gmail.com Cc: 28830@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <00822521-d167-497d-62e1-0a567271cf7b@tobias.gr> Subject: Re: [bug#28830] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-ggtags. References: <87o9pa3xti.fsf@gmail.com> <20171016065131.4e838899@cbaines.net> <87zi8r1jfk.fsf@gmail.com> <20171031082218.2a45cfab@cbaines.net> In-Reply-To: <20171031082218.2a45cfab@cbaines.net> --6GcbHbi0hqh992PDGSoxCDv6S1fVNpIRi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hullo, Oleg Pykhalov wrote: > Pushed as cd5c3979d18ca5bc5d32b9044330453c244df1a5 Thanks (+ congratulations :-)! Christopher Baines wrote: > I don't think there is any harm in improving on the descriptions of the= > software from the upstream source. Agreed. I'd go further & suggest that in cases like this, where there's an obvious mistake upstream, we be proactive and fix it. Inelegance is subjective; this isn't.[0] Kind regards, T G-R --- [0]: it would have been correct to write =E2=80=98Frontend to =E2=80=99. Adding =E2=80=98the=E2=80=99 to it would be wrong, since =E2=80=98GNU Glo= bal=E2=80=99 is a proper noun. But writing =E2=80=98Frontend to GNU Global tagging =E2=80=99= changes the structure: the object of =E2=80=98to=E2=80=99 is now the word =E2=80=98sy= stem=E2=80=99 and not =E2=80=98GNU Global=E2=80=99. =E2=80=98System=E2=80=98 isn't a proper noun, so it requ= ires an article. --6GcbHbi0hqh992PDGSoxCDv6S1fVNpIRi-- --0885Uif8Es6EH5c1wMitIJcamgc3QxOk2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCWfjRiw0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15N/cBAJTBQB6YBF9TGtQx0R0t4Om11RkHrMcVY4sNnAj9 9u78AP4wMKFvYSWJ6aIoT1Do2pw3/0XYLhoDS6rWqO7VemJHBg== =M7Of -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0885Uif8Es6EH5c1wMitIJcamgc3QxOk2--