From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id UPhFNZycwl/MIAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 18:53:16 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id ePb7MJycwl+JKAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 18:53:16 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37386940466 for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 18:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37864 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kj5LO-00079B-T6 for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 13:53:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56098) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kj5LC-00077b-9T for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 13:53:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kj5LB-0000Dn-U3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 13:53:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kj5LB-0006ub-QY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 13:53:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44928: guix upgrade command does not accept a list of packages Resent-From: Luis Felipe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 18:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 44928 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 44928@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: "bug-guix@gnu.org" Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.160658952326501 (code B ref -1); Sat, 28 Nov 2020 18:53:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2020 18:52:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49049 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kj5KE-0006tN-RV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 13:52:03 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:35756) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kj5KB-0006sx-4u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 13:52:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55898) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kj5K9-0006Mo-Jc for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 13:51:58 -0500 Received: from mail-40141.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.141]:12309) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kj5K6-0008Ev-0M for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 13:51:56 -0500 Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 18:51:44 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1606589509; bh=oNu9dM6ZaU+75JMCXP8TTwM+6p9Q9/s2jTw8DDG5RM8=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:From; b=I90VUDiUTUW/idJUvJj7jdn/l5XvA4V8ut9XsB29J1TkWT9NjfFk94Clx+zKjOytC xsFolrHBbtsK3Gzj7fvX3DIFPMx/PYS28XDduo3alj0xHUESfHBC3NVxcO80jtTXEm mNYYBjG53rV4toGXWCgPr+YCjYMAeP2IfuqBQgxc= Message-ID: <-UI20flvic2q9oWvpwg54ddy3XgUEzot8UpZQEMMz14qmhRntjprmW0rTyR1qIYhDbYH_G7eRYum2D3uREcT0lnXP6zdLxgC7S3M_v5VIJs=@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.141; envelope-from=luis.felipe.la@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40141.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS=0.655, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" Reply-to: Luis Felipe , Luis Felipe From: Luis Felipe via Bug reports for GNU Guix X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.77 X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b=I90VUDiU; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-TUID: 9WvU7Ua/XkYK Guix documentation says that `guix upgrade` is an alias for `guix package -= u`, but the latter can upgrade a list of packages, while the former fails. ## Steps to reproduce 1. guix pull 2. guix upgrade --dry-run 3. Pick two packages from the list shown in (2), say, packages A and B 4. guix upgrade A B ## Expected result Packages A and B are upgraded. ## Unexpected result Step 4 fails with the following message: guix upgrade: error: B: extraneous argument ## System information Using guix 0ae0efd with the Guix System. --- Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo https://luis-felipe.gitlab.io/