From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joshua Branson Subject: Re: Could not find bootstrap binary 'guile-2.0.9.tar.xz' Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:26:05 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87604s12j9.fsf@shack@muto.ca> <87vacogug2.fsf@netris.org> <87bmeficks.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51421) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9H2n-00089b-7b for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:24:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9H2j-0002Nq-82 for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:24:41 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:35199) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9H2j-0002N3-3l for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:24:37 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA672111B for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:24:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dobby (unknown [72.12.220.132]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2B00C10255 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:24:36 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87bmeficks.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:51:31 -0400") List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: help-guix@gnu.org thanks for the clarification! Mark H Weaver writes: > Joshua Branson writes: > >> I guess I'm still a little confused. Suppose that I want to update all >> packages, on my system. The ones owned by root, and the ones owned by >> all other users. Then I'd do this? >> >> $ guix pull && guix package -u >> >> $ logout >> >> $ login DifferentUser >> >> $ guix pull && guix package -u >> >> ...repeat for all other users... >> >> $ su >> >> # guix pull && guix package -u && guix system reconfigure /etc/config.scm >> >> Does that look right? > > Yes, exactly. > > I should also mention that if you'd like to avoid some or all of these > 'guix pull's, you can arrange for user B to always track user A's copy > of Guix like this: > > ln -sf {~A,~B}/.config/guix/latest > > However, manually fiddling with these symlinks is not officially > supported and might stop working in a future version of Guix. Also, > beware that if you accidentally run "guix pull" as user B, it will > overwrite the symlink, and henceforth user B will no longer track user A > until you re-run the above command. > > Alternatively, if you don't want user B to _track_ user A, but you just > ran "guix pull" as user A and now you want to quickly update user B to > the same copy of Guix, you can do this: > > cp -a {~A,~B}/.config/guix/latest > > Mark