From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arun Isaac Subject: Re: Enable guix-devel-mode only in guix source files Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 23:38:32 +0530 Message-ID: References: <87ftzd3pts.fsf@gmail.com> <87y3d4wzcg.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59423) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1frdMh-0001QJ-7r for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 02:08:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1frdG2-0002Ei-E9 for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 02:01:45 -0400 Received: from vultr.systemreboot.net ([45.77.148.100]:49402) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1frdG2-0002By-18 for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 02:01:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y3d4wzcg.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Alex Kost , Pierre Neidhardt Cc: help-guix@gnu.org >> A better approach might be to add it to .dir-locals.el upstream. What do you >> people think? > > I think the less is added to "dir-locals" the better. Especially, there > shouldn't be any functions there in my opinion. Thanks, Alex and Pierre, for your replies. But, why is adding to dir-locals not a good idea?