From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: radoslaw@chmielarz.xyz Subject: Guix and sel4 Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 22:16:39 +0100 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52749) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eape2-00022W-Ty for help-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 16:16:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eapdz-0005gs-Py for help-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 16:16:46 -0500 Received: from mail2.zenbox.pl ([178.216.203.246]:17845) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eapdz-0005ec-EP for help-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 16:16:43 -0500 Received: from mail2.zenbox.pl (ip-178-216-203-246.e24cloud.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.zenbox.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654E29815AE0 for ; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 22:16:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail2.zenbox.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by mail2.zenbox.pl (mail2.zenbox.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g1q8nCb1H67x for ; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 22:16:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from poczta.zenbox.pl (unknown [185.23.21.92]) by mail2.zenbox.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 783D59818588 for ; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 22:16:39 +0100 (CET) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: help-guix@gnu.org Hi, In 2016 David Craven has sent an email about his attempt in using sel4 (genode with sel4 to be exact) with guix (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2016-12/msg00058.html). Do You know if he succeeded or not? And if not where there any substantial blockers or just lack of time? Also while I'm asking would it be possible to use only the microkernel without the genode ecosystem in the guixsd? And on that topic is guixsd able to cross-compile? It already has the sandboxing for the packages so I would imagine it couldn't be that difficult but maybe it wasn't tried out before. I should probably RTFM but this is just a side-note question. Cheers, Radek