From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id yBKxFKvFF2dTAgAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:32:59 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id yBKxFKvFF2dTAgAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:32:59 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1729611179; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=DwMhlz423W/LeekRTN4x7hvs7c9cTzNi/IOfEl+R8qs09paM+Wifk2vYIGCmkXcdWQTivo ztBzONHgpyZA2VBmpZhNq6x3ncaq5jubqANcaVjBh6DZw2DLGtPB4klxyHrD4iuHRgWQPW iq4IFfBSUubCd/TMOVBG5ZDAOqA69TVce2nfkZ3fAtilmqxr3x+B0a8tG5Xm65hH2c0i1H VaL9TJWxjniI/HPhsfz7ep2Pza7+QDP/A01Ly5kQHxinZeDRnVJIwrlbW9LIwtmM+bZmnf +S1RD7xdhC0VrjzaIK3vf00s7ylCREiKCHmJid0iGiOES8/NzFHQvmg9fgBvYQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1729611179; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=SW8rAJ0P023qc3hYI8mPeN6lqNUtEJ5DJMB8T4nU/9c=; b=fnWJI0CfT+Od0Ni8a0sCuaw03pP19WHAz0VjvOOTI/9vtd2M1tG6E0iTRhUCNzVJSUAjLS j6naDC8VOBKlL5lgUgDdJWwGCva2cv9NUxoFrFLTGkI4PYxuaAuq+3+lmFrnFLuQjhpVYQ +27v0KSAKYhI9vlGrP2zhu33ZwXIC6YqZgav4Tk+ofA3kgQXLEnSSZI7AzRdnblv/O0lR8 QcVL5rBT3mErYfpfplM0voHZmDwQxJzGwgvtNu6VL/B7nRkqTRdJSQ2UGx3T+/VTzK5Z4N AGlHmrMmAI+I0rkUbFQaKWhZweWRO/8oghsfUbipcqT4r2C7YH2C7Mr3ljNVyQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F13F47DC68 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:32:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t3Gs7-00032Q-HJ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 11:32:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t3Gs4-00030R-5J for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 11:32:32 -0400 Received: from gaia.aquilenet.fr ([2a0c:e300::2]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t3Gs1-00069p-04 for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 11:32:31 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr (hera.aquilenet.fr [185.233.100.1]) by gaia.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11435108; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:32:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996001730; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:32:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EeDK-ajSEcu5; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:32:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:861:c4:f2f0::c64]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E900F3E1; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:32:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:32:20 +0200 From: Andreas Enge To: Felix Lechner Cc: Nicolas Graves , help-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: Is it dangerous to run guix home/system reconfigure from an uninstalled / development Guix profile? Message-ID: References: <87jze1v4cq.fsf@ngraves.fr> <877ca1qn2m.fsf@lease-up.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877ca1qn2m.fsf@lease-up.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a0c:e300::2; envelope-from=andreas@enge.fr; helo=gaia.aquilenet.fr X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.00 X-Spam-Score: -2.00 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: F13F47DC68 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: PlXOOy32GEKr Am Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 12:21:21PM -0700 schrieb Felix Lechner via: > Also, as an aside, does Guix recommend anything other than the official > development branch? Is that not close to a contradictio in adiecto? If we recommended anything else, would it not become official? Actually I usually work on top of master; probably it would make sense to use a team branch instead if one is interested in contributing to that team. Andreas