From: Tomas Volf <wolf@wolfsden.cz>
To: Jesse <dev@millwood.earth>
Cc: help-guix@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Using local package in shell manifest
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 17:43:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTqJKI4sMwTZZ6pQ@ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7c18653-6e42-41f5-ac9f-aeb1e4fd3a3c@millwood.earth>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6249 bytes --]
On 2023-10-26 10:48:45 -0400, Jesse wrote:
> Thanks Tomas,
>
> I plan to upstream it but there is some more development I'd like to try out
> first. If I put it in the manifest, is there some different syntax I need to
> use? I have been doing some searching and it seems like I would have to wrap
> the "(package ...)" expression in define-public and the use-module seems to
> be a bit different too? I am having trouble finding the distinction in the
> manual.
My understanding is that for guix.scm, the object returned by the file has to be
a package? and it will be installed. That is why you only need:
[..]
(package ...)
If you would put it into the manifest instead, you can just store it into a
variable, it does not even have to be public. So you could do something like:
[..]
(define crosstool-ng
(package ...) ; The very same definition from guix.scm
)
(packages->manifest (list crosstool-ng)) ; The variable from above
Technically you could even just have ...(list (package ...)), but that would get
unwieldy quickly.
Since define-public is for exporting symbols from module, it should not be
required in this particular case.
As far as I can the main difference between guix.scm and manifest.scm is that
former is expected to produce (== have as a last expression) a build-able object
(usually package?), and the latter a manifest? object.
>
> On 10/26/23 10:16, Tomas Volf wrote:
> > On 2023-10-25 16:49:43 -0400, Jesse wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have written a package that I have installed with "guix package
> > > --install-from-file=crosstool-ng.scm". I was able to get it to build and
> > > install. I can use it if I do "source ~/.guix-profile/etc/profile".
> > >
> > > However, I would like to add it to a shell manifest. My manifest just
> > > includes
> > >
> > > (specifications->manifest
> > > (list "gcc" "git" "zsh" "crosstool-ng"))
> > >
> > > My understanding is that "specifications->manifest" is supposed to search
> > > for the packages in the list? It returns the following when I rung "guix
> > > shell" in the directory with the manifest.scm:
> > >
> > > guix shell: loading environment from
> > > '/home/jesse/Code/guix-tests/manifest.scm'...
> > > hint: Consider passing the `--check' option once to make sure your shell
> > > does not
> > > clobber environment variables.
> > >
> > > guix shell: error: crosstool-ng: unknown package
> > > guix shell: error: failed to load
> > > '/home/jesse/Code/guix-tests/manifest.scm':
> > > gnu/packages.scm:545:4: In procedure specification->package+output:
> > > Throw to key `quit' with args `(1)'.
> > >
> > > I'd imagine it doesn't know where to look for the package? Is there a way to
> > > tell guix shell where to look? If not, is there a way to include the package
> > > in the manifest file? For what it's worth, I have attached the package file
> > > in question.
> > I can think of few options:
> >
> > 0. If it would make sense to upstream the package, you should. That will solve
> > your problem.
> >
> > 1. Next you could create your own channel, and publish the package there. After
> > adding the channel, it should also just work.
> >
> > 2. You could load the package by an absolute path and use it that way, something
> > like this (untested):
> >
> > (concatenate-manifests
> > (list (specifications->manifest (list "gcc" "git" "zsh"))
> > (packages->manifest (list (load "/home/.../crosstool-ng.scm")))))
> >
> > 3. Alternative of the above would be to move the package definition into the
> > manifest.scm itself, allowing you to drop the load invocation.
> >
> > Dunno, maybe there are better ways.
> >
> > > This is also my first foray into Guix and Guile, so I've been kind of
> > > banging my head through writing a package and the manual but I got a little
> > > stuck here.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > (use-modules
> > > (guix packages)
> > > (guix git-download)
> > > (guix licenses)
> > > (guix profiles)
> > > (guix build-system gnu)
> > > (guix build-system python)
> > > (guix build utils)
> > > (gnu packages python)
> > > (gnu packages autotools)
> > > (gnu packages gettext)
> > > (gnu packages texinfo)
> > > (gnu packages pkg-config)
> > > (gnu packages base)
> > > (gnu packages flex)
> > > (gnu packages gawk)
> > > (gnu packages man)
> > > (gnu packages bison)
> > > (gnu packages compression)
> > > (gnu packages ncurses)
> > > )
> > >
> > > (package
> > > (name "crosstool-ng")
> > > (version "1.26.0")
> > > (source (origin
> > > (method git-fetch)
> > > (uri (git-reference
> > > (url "https://github.com/crosstool-ng/crosstool-ng.git")
> > > (commit (string-append "crosstool-ng-" version))))
> > > (sha256
> > > (base32
> > > "04z7zwhxfbjqrd4j16lviilppsd8phwi8zv2rs4jpkmqni6856j1")
> > > )
> > > ))
> > > (build-system gnu-build-system)
> > > (native-inputs
> > > (list autoconf
> > > automake
> > > gettext-minimal
> > > libtool
> > > texinfo
> > > bison
> > > flex
> > > gawk
> > > unzip
> > > which
> > > help2man
> > > python
> > > ncurses
> > > pkg-config))
> > > (arguments
> > > '(#:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
> > > (add-before 'bootstrap 'fix-version-gen
> > > (lambda* _
> > > (patch-shebang "maintainer/git-version-gen")
> > > )))))
> > >
> > > (synopsis "A versatile (cross-)toolchain generator.")
> > > (description "A versatile (cross-)toolchain generator.")
> > > (home-page "https://crosstool-ng.github.io/docs/")
> > > (license gpl2)
> > > )
> > T.
> >
>
T.
--
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-26 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-25 20:49 Using local package in shell manifest Jesse
2023-10-26 14:16 ` Tomas Volf
2023-10-26 14:48 ` Jesse
2023-10-26 15:43 ` Tomas Volf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZTqJKI4sMwTZZ6pQ@ws \
--to=wolf@wolfsden.cz \
--cc=dev@millwood.earth \
--cc=help-guix@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).