On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 10:56:51PM +0100, Théo Maxime Tyburn wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the quick reply! > > > For now, it is either packages from Pkg.jl or either packages julia-* > > from Guix. A patch [1] is still pending for being able to mix both. > > Aside that packages from Pkg.jl do not always work out-of-the-box, > > sadly. > > > > 1: > > Ok I see so either I use guix julia-* packages and then I need julia to > ignore packages in ~/.julia and avoid using Pkg, or I use Pkg to > install packages but it will break in some cases and also ignore already > install julia packages from guix. > > What about using JLLs ? I have no precise understanding of how a jll work > and how to use it but it seems they contain binaries and there are > guix packages for them. For example julia-glfw-jll. Could I use GLFW in > julia with this guix package installed ? > > >> I encountered two problems. The first with the package "GR" the > >> second with the package "GLFW". I encountered these bugs while trying > >> the packages "Plots" and the "GLMakie" backend of "Makie" > > > > IIUC, you installed all the packages using Pkg.jl, right? > > Yes until my first message I only installed stuff with Pkg. Now I tried > the guix packages and they work fine. Especially the GR package works so > I can at least plot things now, thanks ! (Makie with Cairo backend is > also working from Pkg install though) > > > and I do not know if Pkg.jl works correctly with the current julia > > from Guix. For instance, "guix shell julia -CN -- julia" then 'using > > Pkg; Pkg.add("Plots")' reports failures. One is reference to build > > directory "/tmp/guix-build-julia-1.6.2.drv-0", see [2]. > > > > 2: > > This seems nasty. For me however everything I tried to install and > precompile with Pkg worked. So "pkg>add Plots" and "using Plots" works > fine. Problems arise when I call a function, say "plot(1:3,1:3)". > > > For now, I do not have a solution and I do not have time to work on > > it. Sorry. I would be happy if someone fixes the issue; probably > > patch#51319 helps here. :-) > > I’ll try that out, it seems promising. Combining packages from Pkg and > guix while prioritizing guix packages and avoid reinstalling them seems > like the right way to get the problematic packages under control for now > (by that I mean creating a guix package for them). > > I never tested a patch though. How do I do this ? Is it on a branch of > the git repo ? The way I do it is I read my emails with mutt and I pipe the patch file (either the e-mail or a part of it, depending on how it came through) to 'cd workspace/guix; git am' and then test it out from there. There is also CBaines's patch tracker. If you add https://git.guix-patches.cbaines.net/git/guix-patches as another remote (git remote add guix-patches https://git.guix-patches.cbaines.net/git/guix-patches) then you can cherry-pick c6e882a52b5e736d0ac11872bc2dc6e26100115a and test out the patch that way. -- Efraim Flashner רנשלפ םירפא GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted