From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id WGm2HpVC/1/TNAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 18:57:25 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id IHFtGpVC/19pPAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 18:57:25 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8226E9402A9 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 18:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43700 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzlKb-0006T9-Tz for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:57:22 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36318) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzlKR-0006SI-Ea for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:57:11 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:46923) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzlKP-0004U3-Jp for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:57:11 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C065C0176; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:57:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:57:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=oA7CusMP5BiY08wOEdT6Ddt2gVsvtDUa82VrcEepdUA=; b=GBnDJv1cTvST nNi9JjF9bKU9YbcLTer4Acga3yiaSmz73bQoB+mVCtTlNVddQ04fiQ2TCbULdHM/ n6DI45UB4Nw/+bdHUfDPM9IgDfTDpkNFm+pCXZIah/hAzD7yEIeDe4z1OD4W9Ml7 MondgwdyA0+PwiGvioBpArq+f9QbhcQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=oA7CusMP5BiY08wOEdT6Ddt2gVsvtDUa82VrcEepd UA=; b=BrMjW7STWI6yvvGsRwd4w/nvay9RlycxYCuCOgaVkDGvGtn4/nPjk0vkN IJgWBOenQkO40TSTCuoRcQJIjIz1v/PlEOq5F8jn7GRSqYh8XbyezozCkuTHxPE8 YNISETmZr5ljTb9nDp80FjCPLygehk99dgj19YonrCPp//nDVARMvKqr1he/LiQf ESvZWOub+bpbSckFlabl123GODw83LZy9+lBlkR4vOLjLEngloRegV+oD26NgEWq NKMvPAZC21qMQ3xMDgsgz+VhahEIm8LB1vahCuEd5Lm6+QYNmWMUM/Je5AuXAxDX YbCcvj8PqxPyty0A/Gef7pyTRbrgA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedukedrtdefgdduudekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggugfgjsehtke ertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefgudffteettdekkeduhffgfefgie efgeeuieetudejffelieduueeifffgudfgudenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghen ucfkphepuddttddruddurdduieelrdduudeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenuc frrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (pool-100-11-169-118.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [100.11.169.118]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 27C49240057 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:57:08 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:57:06 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: help-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround? Message-ID: References: <20210113132223.x4wgnwwph2jwtfb5@wzguix> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210113132223.x4wgnwwph2jwtfb5@wzguix> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.28; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out4-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.56 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=GBnDJv1c; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=BrMjW7ST; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8226E9402A9 X-Spam-Score: -1.56 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: gShOjqduyC9Q On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 02:22:23PM +0100, Wiktor Żelazny wrote: > These attempts were either ignored by guix or resulted in > > guix time-machine: error: got unexpected path `Backtrace:' from substituter I don't think this error is related to time-machine and unstable source code. It appears to be .