From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id YC0tHX1PlF9cMgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 15:59:57 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id +O7wGH1PlF/ecwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 15:59:57 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD971940105 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 15:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48250 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWLxT-0005mX-IS for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 11:59:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50768) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWLxM-0005mP-1Q for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 11:59:48 -0400 Received: from w4.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.165]:40652) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWLxK-0005wX-01 for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 11:59:47 -0400 Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w4.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FE31060166; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 15:59:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1603555184; s=s1; d=tuta.io; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=LW601iO6uwyqfT2CQZPj9/6iRTkneb2bRct2DPAkNjY=; b=AfyTuaBy4h1WcxF+VzGr96tAY7DG5OAy49NGfDedqPy/Syb3QH8TlUJsr8D0kI61 tjxGKcd5m7csrOVX6iiVCjicDYUKvZBaXq/m37vxf1f6Dnpn991u3vwzHek9LWW/8iz EcOWeCbUL7kVdiK/oXXc/kl4ODY/rCX5rwy5WZnCLoh5+jgCkA1KwzZZ47CR/wzdoRz euulIbB8KlDD7PrhAx8YRRZMWoc1uoIzifQlo/uycFTtBI1yICc+eA6OvR01w9iq+Ft 9m/8V697nqMHlEZ+7XtYBZ2uB4RyFDtB4KLGsqxQYgUvmNxyE42ckkBL7oDZrkv3qpa mZiU90pphg== Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:59:44 +0200 (CEST) To: zimoun Cc: Help Guix Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <86imb32r0k.fsf@gmail.com> Subject: Re: problem with common lisp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.165; envelope-from=rndd@tuta.io; helo=w4.tutanota.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/24 11:54:23 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" Reply-to: Adam Kandur From: Adam Kandur via X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=tuta.io header.s=s1 header.b=AfyTuaBy; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.51 X-TUID: 8SPDeF7ViQpB hi, i realized that i have this problem with sbcl itself, if i install sbcl in my main profile (without any of my packages, only sbcl from guix channel) i still got this error: fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 1954 tid 1954: Unhandled SIGILL at 0x52000e9d. Welcome to LDB, a low-level debugger for the Lisp runtime environment. ldb> Oct 21, 2020, 22:51 by zimon.toutoune@gmail.com: > Please keep help-guix CC. :-) > > On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 23:53, Adam Kandur wrote: > >> hi, i mean that my packages for common lisp are same as one week ago when everything worked. also i had same issues with packages from guix channel. >> don't know about guix-deploy >> > > I understand. > > First, since the package you are building is yours, more information > is required to be able to find what is wrong. Idem about your > channel. > > > The questions in my previous email are: > > 1. could you provide the last version of Guix where it "worked"? > 2. could you provide the current version of Guix where it is "broken"? > > The #1 means that you have to: > > a) "guix pull -l | grep guix". This will display all the previous > versions of Guix you had (hoping that you have not deleted by running > "guix gc" with some well-chosen options). > From these versions (hashes), you can run: > > guix time-machine --commit= -- build -L paht/to/your/local/pkg sbcl-foo > > and see which worked and which not. The easiest is to go > anti-chronological (start by your current Guix version and go > backward). > > b) "guix describe" and probably attach the recipe of your broken > package. For example it seems that one of your package is named > "sbcl-deploy" since you have one item in the store named > "/gnu/store/fgfag09f1amsk82bs6jmg9h4rv6hqb94-sbcl-deploy-0.0.0-1.59fd497" > and this package is not in "master", AFAICT. > > > All the best, > simon >