From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 8NbaISlrPl9YdQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:23:05 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id qFTgHSlrPl/WQAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:23:05 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E04639402CC for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49334 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8jax-00068S-TK for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 08:23:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46540) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8jaq-00067o-9x for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 08:22:56 -0400 Received: from w4.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.165]:47046) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8jam-0000oT-Ql for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 08:22:56 -0400 Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w4.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD3D1060140; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:22:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1597926169; s=s1; d=tuta.io; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=fMODp/ggkZs66qYomB/gaYgQR39+Jww9U35MBiMjhjU=; b=zzMisRoTH0UY6+cUACFJf63Vkyy2iyvAWImlv22Ckxrw6RoDmqww/j+Y79CgufwQ Ia1OtZwptR5g6ECXLPRlDs1FDQM6Zn3g79xulj7fSxj46Kv0nsK3QAxRe6pHs6mS6rL 7ipSPa7HWuElnfuWhqrJHXNSneX4UFA6kfmjnC5yVzWrXr78K8Lp4lD3Dzv90ZXUY3u SQ2abzVoP4PEKxvL8vatVezTMnCbF3Kpwg4pxXv34s+sCmrWBaeqy+F7gomAX3GyIzj B+D+ctojJaqrWAWRxql4X0qHSgSoTKTNdz0dJa2Q9Fr4+oNbyKjR0sYBpYkzx9gnlv1 mausApQT/g== Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:22:49 +0200 (CEST) To: John Soo Cc: Help Guix Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: building emacs from tarball inside guix env MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.165; envelope-from=rndd@tuta.io; helo=w4.tutanota.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/20 06:59:08 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" Reply-to: Adam Kandur From: Adam Kandur via X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=tuta.io header.s=s1 header.b=zzMisRoT; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.49 X-TUID: ML8JsGH3NBtB hi it helped. after "guix environment emacs" configuration was ok. but there some additional questions i have: 1) where "guix environment emacs" look for env description? 2) i tried to recreate env using inputs described in gnu/packages/emacs.scm in emacs package but got error described in the first message. is there way for manual recreating environment that i didn't notice? 2) what is better way to build sources as they are (from tar, just for testing, not for packaging)? Aug 20, 2020, 12:04 by jsoo1@asu.edu: > Hi Adam, > > The guix environment command by default gives an environment *required to build* the given package. > > In this case > > guix environment emacs > > Should get you close. Then you can combine with the ad-hoc flag to adjust if the requirements of the tarball are different than the package definition in guix. > > Hope that helps, > > John >