From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Boskovits?= <boskovits@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Getting rid of "source file [...] newer than compiled" messages
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 23:24:58 +0200
Message-ID: <CAE4v=piO=a8g+usrgYyNp_pLVU1c_wbzZMeCpevNuTSLk=iOnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87ef6q3muf.fsf@gmail.com> <87lg0y1xut.fsf@elephly.net>
	<875zs2313w.fsf@gmail.com> <87imw21jpk.fsf@elephly.net>
	<87wokh1zc0.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87k1g6ncss.fsf@gmail.com> <87r2aeg96d.fsf@elephly.net>
	<87ftqun8ce.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35781)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <boskovits@gmail.com>) id 1hCsoL-0004ZX-JJ
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 17:25:14 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <boskovits@gmail.com>) id 1hCsoJ-0007ov-M2
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 17:25:13 -0400
Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52d]:33988)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <boskovits@gmail.com>) id 1hCsoJ-0007nt-6f
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 17:25:11 -0400
Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id x14so8425689eds.1
	for <help-guix@gnu.org>; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 14:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87ftqun8ce.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e@gmail.com>
Cc: help-guix <help-guix@gnu.org>

Hello Katherine,

Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e@gmail.com> ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont=
:
2019. =C3=A1pr. 6., Szo, 23:16):
>
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>
> > This is really odd and I cannot reproduce this.  I wonder if this might
> > be related to some unusual file system choices or settings that cause
> > Guile to think that the source files are more recent.
>
> I have accepted that I have somehow gotten myself into a dark corner of
> Guix! I was expecting there to be a Guix command that would basically
> get any package back into a good state. I was kind of surprised that
> `guix build --check` or `guix build --repair` didn't help me out. My
> expectation was that maybe this would check the hash of the store with
> upstream and rebuild or redownload a substitute.
>

I believe you might be looking looking for guix gc --verify, and
suboptions thereof.
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Invoking-guix-gc.html

Does that help?

> > Can you show us the mtime of these files?  In my case both the scm and
> > the go files all have their mtime as 1970-01-01 01:00:01.000000000
> > +0100.
>
> One interesting point might be that there are no `.go` files. I would
> argue Guile's error message here could use some care, but even a better
> error message won't get me to a better spot :)
>
> Thanks again for the time, Ricardo.
>
> --
> Katherine
>

Best regards,
g_bor