From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Amirouche Boubekki <amirouche@hypermove.net>
Subject: Re: exploring the code
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 21:27:53 +0200
Message-ID: <9b9488006f4c760e1c8ffdcf030e18af@hypermove.net>
References: <CAJ98PDwPp_A86B4rKC9f9Up0HJtxGsVFQeu+o1zsesvUH3bVSQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<877fchn70q.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9bl65k9.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54183)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <amirouche@hypermove.net>) id 1bPagX-0000Bv-EG
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:28:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <amirouche@hypermove.net>) id 1bPagV-0005gY-H2
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:28:04 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87h9bl65k9.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org>
Cc: help-guix <help-guix@gnu.org>, Help-Guix <help-guix-bounces+amirouche=hypermove.net@gnu.org>

On 2016-07-19 16:55, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> 
>> Catonano <catonano@gmail.com> skribis:
>> 
> 
> My point is that Geiser should not be expected to be 100% reliable.
> 'M-x rgrep' is sometimes a helpful complement.  ;)

I used to 'M-x rgrep' now I've bound 'C-x r' to silver searcher grep 
(command is ag).