From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id SOYBB5PAMGGebAEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 14:16:19 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id uJbCApPAMGE1OQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:16:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1782C31C8 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 14:16:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44352 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLldh-0005XM-1c for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:16:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51376) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLl8D-000239-I6 for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 07:43:45 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21157) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLl86-0005uQ-NJ for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 07:43:45 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1630583015; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=FvOVtiZwxI2t9ke+mCyExmuD226IsTQIKLNyuEgsYkQgmJmZZp1FLy4SRJLpXM4apiA9QjL0MCh9PCK3XqVeTKE3sMyn9ZiGzVlHGNKoS09uijXBjZuUwb1rcGAXsooZyux74uwBMI26GYtNDcU0MP5OZnsvdfsoJ2o2hx9eCBM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1630583015; h=Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=9Uw7x0AX7RzMT3B3zFfG6j0N+2BPjg710EDApANDjAc=; b=PpRa45yh4lIg7cCowik68QDKZ8ucvqHvtyPY2YgKu/QPf5nXRibIEvdIaGpE5sJcRCkUNobaGTkSvLZtp3EMxETZRsP/yo0I2X1ilHwjwkhHPhqJjuJKUEY60iEI19WtxBFLrKlB+YEL1g6zzn4uhrPpl2HE2K0BHrH9jMLnZ9U= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=a-rx.info; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rx@a-rx.info; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1630583015; s=zoho; d=a-rx.info; i=rx@a-rx.info; h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=9Uw7x0AX7RzMT3B3zFfG6j0N+2BPjg710EDApANDjAc=; b=m23EcFq17/W3zfUHAqgyCZQlgj1zn4b9re+gonr8FxCJfDVvTeZHLCfwZLR9XuJM 1QwDZksojK7a4C1hKJDI9HKDljZ5Q+vd/oHuIdcwtrueEhoXAyzw2+5k8BCBDnlYJGw xzciky0P1p6xyHXlSh+J20jcCYakxjvg6B1qIUV4= Received: from softland (host5-81-182-101.range5-81.btcentralplus.com [5.81.182.101]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1630583011124774.4812388769684; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 04:43:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rx by softland with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLl7w-008v4W-Ay for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:43:28 +0100 From: Andreas Reuleaux To: help-guix Subject: Re: pulling from my personal channel only - is this possible ? References: <87ilzk2sna.fsf@softland> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:43:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: (zimoun's message of "Thu, 2 Sep 2021 13:29:31 +0200") Message-ID: <87y28fjj8g.fsf@softland> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-ZohoMailClient: External Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.51; envelope-from=rx@a-rx.info; helo=sender4-of-o51.zoho.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1630584978; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=9Uw7x0AX7RzMT3B3zFfG6j0N+2BPjg710EDApANDjAc=; b=LjCn88OQwaMvBb/MYfj7seE0gAtG2h3jEW9ZkKfw5ltWsRcWiRjdxKId+duZ4F0vYBkNlV X3/AWnK6Am4w71I0X6bLO4rBF8e9i4FmHTAOs2qifch4wxOfUXS5UGd0RtrS0uBGy9oaTV 3do5EAmqPSIgIS+6iwvnf4l6ZdZQ2/VCpojGO6BQa2cnhNBmBJHPzenecwWDZV543DrRvk e00W9c/Vx9gbe3i6yu2/2Qb2vT5NutzKEpk3gRzTZQ6GTxG/u5e9sUhluF6oRzfO1jSiE0 EvlBMFJDwaSZ97sfPHSltIf6xEC/H7zmQEAerRaeGrrhqPccO2H16gyb9OtkxA== ARC-Seal: i=2; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1630584978; a=rsa-sha256; cv=pass; b=ZKjF8HVTFa3ek1h59qFUMgrKrXr5bJu9+Z5uu/9ta72SVp0KOjl6cpnNIit1b8JHO+zQJD E004sfY9jXaUyqc4086dkr8H820iNZOHwirBYo9viqgaJAfZIDWBEdok6bIHZgVLmGNatD kHh3KbPK0pKvF70IBNoUB1dMkR/6bMCTSNBxkln5Cw9/nAx0gODeGK/SDfWQ1DgaKKj/Jh TQfz/1QruCYl9/MpTez3wW19S9aNgXWoRAGve5cGAI29FH2M2ym+QxHpDEBZ4zLh2DTe5x RXmhsdKa0ykwNP9m92JQ8zIoN/51X0mIlCtA6k8XBEaVxWKDyDq5PtIu3u+lKg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=a-rx.info header.s=zoho header.b=m23EcFq1; arc=pass ("zohomail.com:s=zohoarc:i=1"); dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.12 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=a-rx.info header.s=zoho header.b=m23EcFq1; arc=pass ("zohomail.com:s=zohoarc:i=1"); dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1782C31C8 X-Spam-Score: -2.12 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: zpKet40vSDOa Hi, yes, this does make sense, and many thanks for writing this down in detail. - I will follow your steps (and develop my own routine). And computers are getting faster after all (to some extent still): My 53sec for pulling were on an 4 core i5 (with 16G RAM) - this e-mail I am writing on a 8 core i7 w/ 16G RAM as well - and I might want use it for guix at some point (and that should accelerate things then). All the best, -Andreas zimoun writes: > Hi, > > For developing, my workflow looks like: > > 0 git clone http://git.a-rx.info/channel/ /tmp/channel > 1 edit /tmp/channel/some-file.scm > 2 guix build -L /tmp/channel ghc-filepatter > 3 loop to 1 until I am satisfied > 4 git -C /tmp/channel commit ... > > then it depends on my mood to have http://git.a-rx.info/channel/ > listed in my default channels file ~/.config/guix/channels.scm. Well, > when I am tired to type '-L path/to/channel' then I add it and I run: > > guix pull > > which allows then to simply do > > guix package -i ghc-filepattern -p path/to/profile > > Does it make sense? > > About "guix pull", yes it should appear slow. But you cannot do more > than wait... although the situation is mitigated by [1]. (Optimizing > it is not as straightforward as it looks like at first because the > bottleneck are at various stages. :-) For instance, > .) > > Have you seen 'channel-with-substitutes-available' [1]? > > 1: > > All the best, > simon