From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Subject: Re: LUKS-encrypted root and unencrypted /boot ? Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2018 17:48:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87va8qi14v.fsf@lassieur.org> References: <87in4tgbg4.fsf@jnanam.net> <87effh8d94.fsf@lassieur.org> <87a7q3fkji.fsf@jnanam.net> <878t5n8eob.fsf@lassieur.org> <87effef8u3.fsf@jnanam.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58628) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flyn1-0004lb-5O for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 11:48:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flymx-0004Pb-VZ for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 11:48:23 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:59634) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flymx-0004PB-Kb for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 11:48:19 -0400 In-reply-to: <87effef8u3.fsf@jnanam.net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Benjamin Slade Cc: help-guix@gnu.org Benjamin Slade writes: > Thanks, Cl=C3=A9ment. You're welcome! > > > > Do you use Libreboot? > > > > > > Yes, I'm using Libreboot. Does this make a great difference over the > > > manufacturer firmware in this case? > > > It might, because the GRUB used is the one shipped with Libreboot. > > So it has nothing to do with Guix. I think talking to the libreboot > > people would help you more. (Disclaimer: I have the same issue, I > > find that pressing 'c' and typing 'cryptomount ahci0,gpt3' makes the > > process faster.) > > Thanks, I'll look into that. For the moment I've just switched to having > an unencrypted root and encrypted /home partition (where the swapfile > also lives), > ...which seems to me better from a security standpoint (I can > use --iter 500, sha512, &c. without an issue). But it's easier put a malware in an unencrypted root ;)