From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id qMfRBFIzSmFL1gAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 21:32:34 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id kAx3AFIzSmHURQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 19:32:34 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 049212B321 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 21:32:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47998 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSlVI-0002wK-6F for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:32:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36348) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSlUt-0002wB-Ln for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:32:07 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:9058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSlUq-0000FD-BG for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:32:07 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 26238f7a; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 21:32:02 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=20190914; bh=LMloky3wHV8M24HaXKYW4dgSHQWo6a1y+K 2MF/UgNEg=; b=dubgHktffUsuyw1FFNSF6dN/dsNShJ1S0R/LC4pqbPmiCgqcBI t0nr7EmmujSNwQZ+cAanTrDZvoP4H8bT1R6FxGR4sPVX+jE4uOiCzgeiKTRGFhqJ nj76R0JssHV8MNWgL8rQ3roumRtiwYGRb/kQAenfM4NesB/zM1iH0mhsMymJCH2q 1myYNX2nzaV76KFdfzc21HH+QwY4+n+2KJgbnmuyf3pMes0ToWgNdgdh3LUFPdbL gk20z+ra+35HyoB3HP/HJKnWOnr5i/nxJeIYuMqD2iSFs5T/HNGSnewnT522rYIs UFYaRQ6KrdxT4FV8IhZHkBK5Zz1+OOvEXi1A== Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id bb8fefe9; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 21:32:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id f94f5914; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 21:32:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 72334e05 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 21:32:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Joshua Branson To: "Jonathan McHugh" Cc: "Andy Tai" , help-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: building but skipping tests? References: <871r5ijuj0.fsf@dismail.de> Mail-Followup-To: "Jonathan McHugh" , "Andy Tai" , help-guix@gnu.org Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:31:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Jonathan McHugh's message of "Tue, 21 Sep 2021 07:35:46 +0000") Message-ID: <87v92tn2s1.fsf@dismail.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=78.46.223.134; envelope-from=jbranso@dismail.de; helo=mx1.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1632252753; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=WiUQhG/Ay5TeYYLlQ/GtDDRT0EC6xpaoosl8Ebk7DPY=; b=n8+w2CJcAVWZxg2gV5oPHjSzBPLsyM3thgZBwCphTQWuKXASusT/ylY0xSKOCo8MXBAfSr 9D5UvU+hTqjf/i0rnTGlAkJ+LSwbW/ym8YkkgSLYOVA9P2GWKhLqNieEm4kn90mNsLzR9L 5SVTaq6fXV2m1xucwhOZncLwgnZ+2fVc/MTJWZtp7OtO5aVd+vcs/rGkdJ6MVNiOtpJjGo seVI7wwwPS6nltqSw1A/C+T2hbZX7kXup/S0zFsuuYEOTzVAtdOWly+RxdqGBidkIivq6H d2Zp3yr6plyk5KZ4W5Jg+3E14mRIPxhNE4FaB2P0nB4WvmvHuwt2N/PUXsVQWQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1632252753; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=VXyCerzm3AXhtZsHVAsklC/aSlR29aSwQXimi3SuoJuZ76EuTbDPCFoCKn89lsnrQBYOvN gSr73UiHLzyBb119abc7f+AGQUXB82YGqpLijkerfx70pWKsuLXwgGo989k3Rq7f4SxD6k gPAzaGH0ze18Z/0r+7AP6RjRcvQZQrTm/l/i/UCuIHW4xfLe0SEYDF6v9Z83zpBdOTFv9G iC6zYGEZuNuhYJbYBMIAmXDJSAh7LHK8MGviD8B3gCEtizOU2reTL6tct1pEEZuRzGneE6 W6Z4A+v6vQuOhiFtupXE6fp9agIKc3XwF24HpAImtLaqv+b6G22JbhLC3EOvVg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=dubgHktf; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.09 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=dubgHktf; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 049212B321 X-Spam-Score: -2.09 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 7m9qbV7hb0b8 "Jonathan McHugh" writes: > Hi Joshua, > > Is there any published guidance covering what test responses are considered as flagging up? > > For instance, would problems be sent to bug-guix@gnu.org as a matter of principle? And what should and should not be included? https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Tracking-Bugs-and-Patches.html There's no hard fast rule about what should or should not be sent. If it feels like a bug, go ahead and submit it. It's typically good to put the output of "guix describe" and "guix system describe" and what hardware you are using when describing a bug. :) > > Kind regards, > > ==================== > Jonathan McHugh > indieterminacy@libre.brussels > > September 21, 2021 8:46 AM, "Joshua Branson" wrote: > >> Andy Tai writes: >> >>> Hi, if I try to install a package and that may trigger building a >>> number of dependencies (when no substitutes for some reason but that >>> is outside the concern of this question), I notice that since the >>> build processes would run the tests by default, that takes a lot of >>> time. I wonder if it is possible to skip tests when building >>> locally? Of course running tests are good but if I am not a >>> developer of the packages being built running the tests may not be of >>> much utility to me. >> >> Note that you can disable the tests. BUT enabling said tests, lets you >> find errors, which you can report, which is really valuable to guix >> developers. :) >> >>> Thanks for the info on this. >> >> -- >> Joshua Branson (jab in #guix) >> Sent from Emacs and Gnus >> https://gnucode.me >> https://video.hardlimit.com/accounts/joshua_branson/video-channels >> https://propernaming.org >> "You can have whatever you want, as long as you help >> enough other people get what they want." - Zig Ziglar > -- Joshua Branson (jab in #guix) Sent from Emacs and Gnus https://gnucode.me https://video.hardlimit.com/accounts/joshua_branson/video-channels https://propernaming.org "You can have whatever you want, as long as you help enough other people get what they want." - Zig Ziglar