* binary installation script on fedora
@ 2018-02-11 11:39 Catonano
2018-02-11 13:41 ` Ricardo Wurmus
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Catonano @ 2018-02-11 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-guix
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1577 bytes --]
I installed Guix with Sharlatan's and Rekado's script on my Fedora desktop
When I try to build a checked out Guix, whithin an environment, I get
...
configure: checking for guile 2.2
configure: found guile 2.2
checking for guile-2.2... no
checking for guile2.2... no
checking for guile-2... no
checking for guile2... /usr/bin/guile2
configure: error: found development files for Guile 2.2, but
/usr/bin/guile2 has effective version 2.0
within the same environment, I do
[catonano@localhost guix] $ which guile
/gnu/store/d51zyb0z0vzij0kxy2k01fab483z80v6-profile/bin/guile
[catonano@localhost guix] $ guile --version
guile (GNU Guile) 2.2.2
Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License LGPLv3+: GNU LGPL 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html>.
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
so why doesn' t this guile get found ?
You may have noticed that the prompt is not preceded by "(env)" as it
happens on GuixSD
but when in the env, things form the env get found and if I do "exit" a new
prompt gets returned and the things from the env are gone, like this
[catonano@localhost guix] $ exit
exit
[catonano@localhost guix] $ which guile
/usr/bin/guile
[catonano@localhost guix] $ guile --version
guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.14
Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License LGPLv3+: GNU LGPL 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html>.
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1932 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: binary installation script on fedora
2018-02-11 11:39 binary installation script on fedora Catonano
@ 2018-02-11 13:41 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-02-12 10:11 ` Catonano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Wurmus @ 2018-02-11 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Catonano; +Cc: help-guix
Catonano <catonano@gmail.com> writes:
> I installed Guix with Sharlatan's and Rekado's script on my Fedora desktop
>
> When I try to build a checked out Guix, whithin an environment, I get
>
> ...
> configure: checking for guile 2.2
> configure: found guile 2.2
> checking for guile-2.2... no
> checking for guile2.2... no
> checking for guile-2... no
> checking for guile2... /usr/bin/guile2
> configure: error: found development files for Guile 2.2, but
> /usr/bin/guile2 has effective version 2.0
Try a pure environment instead.
--
Ricardo
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: binary installation script on fedora
2018-02-11 13:41 ` Ricardo Wurmus
@ 2018-02-12 10:11 ` Catonano
2018-02-12 10:33 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-02-17 19:37 ` Oleg Pykhalov
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Catonano @ 2018-02-12 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo Wurmus; +Cc: help-guix
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 478 bytes --]
2018-02-11 14:41 GMT+01:00 Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>:
>
> Try a pure environment instead.
>
with a pure environmet I get this
Install package 'procps-ng' to provide command 'pidof'? [N/y] N
bash: which: comando non trovato...
Installare il pacchetto «which» per fornire il comando «which»? [N/y] N
ERROR: virtualenvwrapper_lazy.sh: Could not find virtualenvwrapper.sh
notice that the first question is in English, the second one is in Italian.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 888 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: binary installation script on fedora
2018-02-12 10:11 ` Catonano
@ 2018-02-12 10:33 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-02-17 19:37 ` Oleg Pykhalov
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Wurmus @ 2018-02-12 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Catonano; +Cc: help-guix
Catonano <catonano@gmail.com> writes:
> with a pure environmet I get this
>
> Install package 'procps-ng' to provide command 'pidof'? [N/y] N
> bash: which: comando non trovato...
> Installare il pacchetto «which» per fornire il comando «which»? [N/y] N
> ERROR: virtualenvwrapper_lazy.sh: Could not find virtualenvwrapper.sh
This is a Fedora feature. Your prompt tries to run a couple of
commands, but they are not found in a pure environment. Fedora then
offers to install the packages that provide these missing commands.
--
Ricardo
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: binary installation script on fedora
2018-02-12 10:11 ` Catonano
2018-02-12 10:33 ` Ricardo Wurmus
@ 2018-02-17 19:37 ` Oleg Pykhalov
2018-02-17 21:12 ` Catonano
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Pykhalov @ 2018-02-17 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Catonano; +Cc: help-guix
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 663 bytes --]
Hello Catonano,
Catonano <catonano@gmail.com> writes:
> 2018-02-11 14:41 GMT+01:00 Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>:
>
>>
>> Try a pure environment instead.
>>
>
> with a pure environmet I get this
>
> Install package 'procps-ng' to provide command 'pidof'? [N/y] N
> bash: which: comando non trovato...
> Installare il pacchetto «which» per fornire il comando «which»? [N/y] N
> ERROR: virtualenvwrapper_lazy.sh: Could not find virtualenvwrapper.sh
>
>
> notice that the first question is in English, the second one is in Italian.
Similar discussion
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2018-01/msg00404.html>.
Oleg.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: binary installation script on fedora
2018-02-17 19:37 ` Oleg Pykhalov
@ 2018-02-17 21:12 ` Catonano
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Catonano @ 2018-02-17 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Pykhalov; +Cc: help-guix
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 973 bytes --]
2018-02-17 20:37 GMT+01:00 Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust@gmail.com>:
> Hello Catonano,
>
> Catonano <catonano@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > 2018-02-11 14:41 GMT+01:00 Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>:
> >
> >>
> >> Try a pure environment instead.
> >>
> >
> > with a pure environmet I get this
> >
> > Install package 'procps-ng' to provide command 'pidof'? [N/y] N
> > bash: which: comando non trovato...
> > Installare il pacchetto «which» per fornire il comando «which»? [N/y] N
> > ERROR: virtualenvwrapper_lazy.sh: Could not find virtualenvwrapper.sh
> >
> >
> > notice that the first question is in English, the second one is in
> Italian.
>
> Similar discussion
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2018-01/msg00404.html>.
>
> Oleg.
>
I hadn't noticed !
Thank you Oleg !
But anyway I manage dto build Guix on Fedora using a pure envirronment
I also merged thhe SELinux policy and I'm test driving it in these days !
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1844 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-02-17 21:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-02-11 11:39 binary installation script on fedora Catonano
2018-02-11 13:41 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-02-12 10:11 ` Catonano
2018-02-12 10:33 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-02-17 19:37 ` Oleg Pykhalov
2018-02-17 21:12 ` Catonano
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).