From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id RR7hNKKCP2DTMAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 12:35:46 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 2AZQMKKCP2B+NwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 12:35:46 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CD4226A77 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:35:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39048 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHQj6-000421-Pz for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 07:35:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHQiu-00041u-W3 for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 07:35:29 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:37970) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHQir-0003Gf-N2 for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 07:35:28 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id ab285dd8; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:35:19 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=20190914; bh=WaWUYpgSGzNa6AiH1Fwfqsnof2L5ICu9lf F17RNt8Zk=; b=oPIaR1tVd4RZ95DdAnVhHb4YCSHACMqtX+7WpxIKZQWj5fyqdf KVxKe7ciXQaki5bMnCkwofzBFjn1nTzTEYDBR6NqzPJ9/v1oRfHSvtY/QK2FOQcR w11sV65X4zh5X48hSKKAhutFYCQaGCx5ikuHOgxFN9ftB7kVA11yNEd7wU7SHWLA KddWR+PtH6nHJlL1D+L5iHfMdFsYIgH85qy7YYyTZtscqLpz6L01oaSbxGHLCWQJ 4ILY2Ripe1FSTZOmctKQc1eIzv0vIm70GS55HK5vxqNu85Ua0/CqAQ3RljqPg1A2 h4Wl36G3C9zkb7HGqOwH8meMbVZCtyAQnvZA== Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 5bfd7bd4; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:35:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 2f3caf79; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:35:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c6adcf6c (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:35:17 +0100 (CET) From: Joshua Branson To: raingloom Cc: "bug-guix@gnu.org" Subject: Re: more than one target service shehperd-root / possible scheme records terribleness References: <20210303115932.575aae04@riseup.net> Mail-Followup-To: raingloom , "bug-guix@gnu.org" Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 07:35:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20210303115932.575aae04@riseup.net> (raingloom@riseup.net's message of "Wed, 3 Mar 2021 11:59:32 +0100") Message-ID: <87sg5c76v1.fsf@dismail.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=78.46.223.134; envelope-from=jbranso@dismail.de; helo=mx1.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1614774946; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=omSrYVYmjYk6KH1OHZ4iprUFuJMLc/2y/Gs3XS29dC0=; b=RUMe1R73I9vKl/ottK3HNhgu/Q+RBU72Xx/GDyp4n9qBdo5fKDB6VmWUIynoTV9BgtFHEQ HXqqyOYiF+uZw8WAMqQwZCWf2gjtObCAy01W4fEDG75lOTvKSxe8vJwG1qUt1Am6bdUEdj I6bMlYwgiLaDhiLrT2IfN3WRI+WUrRUYZCdoobdt9HgAHO2s+6+X0TMjjGHfUPVtvtGwj4 2u/S50YFEWgt8FDp27pKoI0FkfAu/LydbheVBFIaCDCZzyVUC5HLS9YjAU7esd1NozC8Uf oS+vLWFh/RTEIX017Mdd5iUO5LvWnY+OLJa8YiHJ/mzywjlTAF+5qjOMIkcKbQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1614774946; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Yq23bLxC6hxirIPYuUe8wuI18N3OOelDsEhZRCLWMXxyIKfx/nI4yFiJfk3q8SWpAyhabp Ej7+7b4xi5kNVE2UXPwgSIUBGRvzuIYzsjWxi+BL0cGWMtD6tzV87dQW5sSfw7y6Rvw75h dsV3qiMX5nRufRtpgjTm32qVLxOun1OyESmY6f1BVDVKXy3GklG+Yaa6Lb3ElvWutSEFBa ZMn+dGJWA4AjXk1QfMsi0VMwwFFW+XSzxsdXjPZYqGBCJ0bG+rd/jwtV9gmgTQp/MUrsM2 yi1X13J1/RsI/E7ZnKhTUWfUv4TlbI+pQ1FCMqcuXD2kCPvJyqYsBhDQQe3kag== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=oPIaR1tV; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.06 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=oPIaR1tV; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9CD4226A77 X-Spam-Score: -3.06 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: KG60UIkugylt raingloom writes: > I have an operating-system called bingobongo. I have another called > greg that inherits the bingobongo config. If I leave the services field > empty in greg, there is no issue. If I define it as > (operating-system-services bingobongo) then all hell breaks loose and I > get the aforementioned error and no amount of filtering seems to fix it > becaues then I get the same error but with "profile" instead of > shepherd-root. > > Now, I don't know what causes this, whether it's a Guix issue or > Guile's record system being... well... kind of terrible, but in any > case it should be treated like a bug, because a user should not have to > dig as deeply into Guix internals as I have so far. Can you show us some code? That may help. -- Joshua Branson (joshuaBPMan in #guix) Sent from Emacs and Gnus https://gnucode.me https://video.hardlimit.com/accounts/joshua_branson/video-channels https://propernaming.org "You can have whatever you want, as long as you help enough other people get what they want." - Zig Ziglar