From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id GC45A8/Bjl8paQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:54:07 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id WN+hOs7Bjl96CAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:54:06 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96B5A940112 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43854 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUpHJ-0000IE-JL for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 06:54:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47268) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUpHA-0000Fc-A1 for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 06:53:56 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:54822) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUpH7-0005NS-VX for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 06:53:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=eKM8g5gQvVcfqQ2FllZQc5Dd1ncNLPUoHkPrNReR4LY=; h=date:in-reply-to: references:subject:cc:to:from; b=ZYh8u3sp7YQZguSZGNsaZfwpc3SHLCyVAFKGe fZff9UKYdl8looYt/0WCKM1A9eP2lAz+ljg5k/mswEvQ0cR+YiFURg3mwG2IsOgl8XhBnR FPFGgjI3N3kCiq2L3yPtTAtcdemBAuIg+7yTRHewsUNls4miyH7VJ/hV5LxDYBfM/wnD8K IVm+z5+PeHjsYGTKyso2RyhRYeD7twv8incI3aEGeFSgDGNqjoU6C+OuHO+T8Mus3IC17d IjmN8HAAyQASv8k+R5tqi+uzxXGYkpzMe7mWAwdFxeEAwlzntL/m+VdOEW0GAS+kjeuRXi Y6s637ZkwxGYCAN2gUpFpRsgg== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id e9a3c0c2 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:54:06 +0000 (UTC) BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: jbranso@dismail.de Cc: Hubert Lombard , help-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: Spams in the help-guix list ? References: <5eeef2885c6a8c1d820f480b1e885429@tobias.gr> <20201019102250.15834289@hubert-lombard.website> <015b5f8c95dfcbf4908a8bc30207ac0d@dismail.de> In-reply-to: <015b5f8c95dfcbf4908a8bc30207ac0d@dismail.de> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:53:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87pn5d88xn.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=ZYh8u3sp; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=tobias.gr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.31 X-TUID: Aft0iBnB2jzD --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable jbranso@dismail.de =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > I personally have never seen spam in the list. All 4 Guix lists get several spams a day. Few of them targeted;=20 most of them promising to enlarge your bitcoin. A minute fraction of those have made it through over the years.=20 I'm very happy to hear they managed to pass unnoticed for you :-) > Are most emails manually approved? We've been lucky & have been spared any competent adversaries so=20 far, but I don't think we should publically discuss our anti-spam=20 measures. > Can I help in some regard? I don't think delegation is tenable with our current system.=20 Thank you very much for the offer. Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX47BxA0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15uFsBAP3/ie8wox/AadBHdD37RaV+bzEtIX0kkm0xwVQ+ tAyeAP9Vtqa6PgWF/f+lfd2voK53SK7fRIdoAB33ukjGeoDPCw== =GbxL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--