From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id SBuQG8q7Pl8TWwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 18:07:06 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id EKxFF8q7Pl9BRgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 18:07:06 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C422C9403A9 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 18:07:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56242 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8oxr-0006OV-QX for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:07:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54308) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8oxj-0006OL-LQ for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:06:55 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:57976) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8oxg-00079G-BC for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:06:55 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419B3529DA for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 20:06:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id am4zR5-6uYyy for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 20:06:46 +0200 (CEST) From: "Jorge P. de Morais Neto" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1597946806; bh=n7jqFE4zZuIXUz8B2eHc5qL5AFYPvenlK01jDt2rH7o=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=H5LiQ4e2rl0LLCzbiGKxtEGJYt62uNVcQ9fKPCiBU0/aRQO1sV3XUyRDmqNo+yCFi 9Eg/T5UstsAmSjgas42UNBnR0ZfQJGlYn/yJ036NTaMSYtGAgm668K+AOr9Xlyt+pn LW6zF2K52bImGE5PGiZhfgELA8k3rT9kXv2KE+daXnZ0OAszIQPHtn2WD640qpvv9B ex+Bwmly/W06NQkXd5s8wqzI4mWAR3kcbXYGLErsUw4U4Tv5gaU25s+gUM2oPCxMAS PtcbBxbzzVQwF7QcDX5CCwQM2mZ1PXhURKWHS8ssC4bh9cD7Metx/WQr/xHpybpvj4 OsqKtTnlxbXTQ== To: help-guix@gnu.org Subject: Enchant from Guix misreports numerals on both Debian buster and bullseye Mail-Followup-To: help-guix@gnu.org Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:06:39 -0300 Message-ID: <87mu2pfaz4.fsf@disroot.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.21.23.139; envelope-from=jorge@disroot.org; helo=knopi.disroot.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/20 13:50:38 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=disroot.org header.s=mail header.b=H5LiQ4e2; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=disroot.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.21 X-TUID: CWY/HldmcG/U Hello. I reported Emacs bug#42248 and I and the Emacs developers realized at least part of the problem is with Guix version of Enchant. On an updated Debian bullseye, enchant 2.2.8 from Guix misreports numerals. The same enchant version, when installed from APT, does not have this problem. Guix enchant 2.2.8 on Debian buster also misreports numerals. See (on Debian bullseye): $ enchant-2 -v @(#) International Ispell Version 3.1.20 (but really Enchant 2.2.8) $ which enchant-2 /usr/bin/enchant-2 $ enchant-2 -l -d en_US /tmp/enchant-test.txt Doesn Amarelou $ guix install enchant; hash enchant-2 [...] $ enchant-2 -v @(#) International Ispell Version 3.1.20 (but really Enchant 2.2.8) $ which enchant-2 /home/jorge/.guix-profile/bin/enchant-2 $ enchant-2 -l -d en_US /tmp/enchant-test.txt 2015 Casa 42 Amarelou 2018 The file /tmp/enchant-test.txt: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Doesn't 2015 Casa 42 Amarelou 2018 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- So enchant 2.2.8 (either from APT or from Guix) does not understand "doesn't"; and, what's worse, enchant-2.2.8 from Guix reports every numeral as a misspelling. Regards -- - - I am Brazilian. I hope my English is correct and I welcome feedback. - -