From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id MNC3GqElrGBcyQAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 00:16:01 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id sDFiFqElrGB/MwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 22:16:01 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93BE825749 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 00:16:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40862 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llIre-0003kI-Jl for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 18:15:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56886) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llIrI-0003jw-Ne for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 18:15:38 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:19152) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llIrE-0005Rf-Gz for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 18:15:36 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id b09be196; Tue, 25 May 2021 00:15:29 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=20190914; bh=9LF09Y7pJY91k1yRxvlUqHDWoyxVQkuE59 5ZjZB3NRA=; b=VEtXHmjf94U3BKZTAXF/9GGOxhkGisKMWlcCDX7en4xi9RZTKM eJhBvEZXY7CMyjZSM5LjRyrN37fHn5MJAPQuws5s4VfrfF+AAonbh0kVU7lC7MG0 vxHVfLr8s1qgUY+cd5xu1t2VH6y4u0m+Yn6MB6S29IH1m3vkMlc5wWEFODev6fQP nKsQGQqP0S0KIVsUoYCW0s4qCg7tbLNU79wkRt+DWbwcf7de7LKGAP2OtHZaL8+T AGD5RcSyrxUkKLZk6qJk7T0c0wIvKEm2om9SZWSUbl3A4ltMgH6vT2p0hiU/DAcb uxcZmYOBakOxasCcSTaHJRGX+vi0GsV1SuCg== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 2cf29c52; Tue, 25 May 2021 00:15:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 0f16a3a0; Tue, 25 May 2021 00:15:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 4cbc0c41 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 25 May 2021 00:15:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Joshua Branson To: Bone Baboon Cc: c4droid , help-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: Pack busybox using guix, but make check have fail tests References: <87a6ok8z2y.fsf@dismail.de> <878s44b4sq.fsf@disroot.org> Mail-Followup-To: Bone Baboon , c4droid , help-guix@gnu.org Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 18:15:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <878s44b4sq.fsf@disroot.org> (Bone Baboon's message of "Mon, 24 May 2021 10:11:01 -0400") Message-ID: <87mtsj7p8j.fsf@dismail.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=78.46.223.134; envelope-from=jbranso@dismail.de; helo=mx1.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1621894560; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=fV6aFMs6S6dec++N2hqDHHQ2ZHDUej2exagsUl9/A24=; b=PG32eqhHfJQ4nKQ4x28GJT2SOvIxaTubt04jQjCYV/VkHqyD23yOV1Rp35F1uA63P4wz/g JdN5CVDha7Hq9M+UkgNAlCeKfTfkcqhZQVJTNFz/weYuqoJsv79dkRUYef2NjHwNzHOj9y MelsBIhpM24K2f1MoxcCcJ3bPs1wEwv6eJZYI+f8HS9hOZt98cqI4ou9NdZg3DAbTjqEd1 2ISO8Zd0jxhXaBQ7BgNz0zRHb77p3WtdyuSJE1wBJ2EcQDGlIS9iap8Lqr9OHf8ZWCgtg9 IJjBvXTWUYt78lF7DHM4gXKCsxXgfcIqYovh9jng55CdU6m5oLwcv4eT74+N4A== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1621894560; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=LMfAjMcZbEWt4vVqUku8hNdsYdyQUM1l49ngQNjO1Hhls2Csb2/KjpJ129xUQ5OJWHz0K0 LN+Dbm2NF2bPHBekKu7ig9ovvwqLzr54nwNdEYLW3ICwlJ1frtIo8x7JR/7tRvUHnZKWNH HRatId+FeuwL0BddQQmp/CssRCX1zPMjaBuhZDF03jzYi7rROvfUJ/MzAe6apt6+o08WIx 131GU7dyx4zWUNjls2d47Mq3mPB/kakBaOafnfR5cF4Nsgri1DKjOi45YRWh1Q+8PUWsQ2 CX84ZotFp6wtUoPTGYgvgrNm34Ee/uqv78C6d76/7cfXIaR5DK5xDS1j6CJ8uQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=VEtXHmjf; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.13 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=VEtXHmjf; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 93BE825749 X-Spam-Score: -3.13 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: LDhezQCC+Dov Bone Baboon writes: > Joshua Branson writes: >> I believe that busybox has a more permissive license than coreutils? > > Looking at the coreutils repository I can see that it is using GPL > version 3 > . When I > run `guix search coreutils` the output says the license is "GPL 3+". > Looking at an individual source code file I can see that it says "either > version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version." . > > BusyBox is licensed under the GPL version > 2. . "To summarize: every version > of BusyBox may be distributed under the terms of GPL version 2. New > versions (after 1.2.2), as a whole, may only be distributed under GPLv2, > not under other versions of the GPL." > > > gives me the impression that GPL version 2 is more permissive than GPL > version 3. Thanks for clarifying! -- Joshua Branson (joshuaBPMan in #guix) Sent from Emacs and Gnus https://gnucode.me https://video.hardlimit.com/accounts/joshua_branson/video-channels https://propernaming.org "You can have whatever you want, as long as you help enough other people get what they want." - Zig Ziglar