From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Getting rid of "source file [...] newer than compiled" messages Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:49:49 +0200 Message-ID: <87k1g1erf6.fsf@elephly.net> References: <875zs2313w.fsf@gmail.com> <87imw21jpk.fsf@elephly.net> <87wokh1zc0.fsf@gmail.com> <87k1g6ncss.fsf@gmail.com> <87r2aeg96d.fsf@elephly.net> <87ftqun8ce.fsf@gmail.com> <87mul2fr1x.fsf@elephly.net> <877ec5n2n0.fsf@gmail.com> <87h8b9f14s.fsf@elephly.net> <87wok2ortk.fsf@gmail.com> <20190410160428.GA4187@jurong> <871s29q155.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48867) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEGQO-0003AS-Hz for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:50:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEGQN-0004O1-Ca for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:50:12 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21276) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEGQM-0004LR-PD for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:50:11 -0400 In-reply-to: <871s29q155.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Katherine Cox-Buday Cc: help-guix@gnu.org Katherine Cox-Buday writes: > Gosh, I am embarassed. The compiled files are indeed in the path Guile > was helpfully trying to point me at: > > #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE > $ ls -a /gnu/store/cd6rjv3qhhghr59wpq4fksfr84d5dsdf-guix-module-union/l= ib/guile/2.2/site-ccache/gcrypt/ > . .. base16.go base64.go common.go hash.go hmac.go package-confi= g.go pk-crypto.go random.go utils.go > #+END_EXAMPLE > > So I went back and took Ricardo's advice and looked at the time's involve= d: > > #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE > $ stat /gnu/store/cd6rjv3qhhghr59wpq4fksfr84d5dsdf-guix-module-union/sh= are/guile/site/2.2/gcrypt/hash.scm > File: =E2=80=98/gnu/store/cd6rjv3qhhghr59wpq4fksfr84d5dsdf-guix-modul= e-union/share/guile/site/2.2/gcrypt/hash.scm=E2=80=99 > Size: 5366 Blocks: 16 IO Block: 4096 regular file > Device: fc02h/64514d Inode: 137942 Links: 1 > Access: (0444/-r--r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root) > Access: 2019-04-10 09:29:22.008888969 -0500 > Modify: 2018-12-25 17:02:43.755150339 -0600 > Change: 2018-12-25 17:02:43.755150339 -0600 > Birth: - > #+END_EXAMPLE > > #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE > $ stat /gnu/store/cd6rjv3qhhghr59wpq4fksfr84d5dsdf-guix-module-union/li= b/guile/2.2/site-ccache/gcrypt/hash.go > File: =E2=80=98/gnu/store/cd6rjv3qhhghr59wpq4fksfr84d5dsdf-guix-modul= e-union/lib/guile/2.2/site-ccache/gcrypt/hash.go=E2=80=99 > Size: 77485 Blocks: 152 IO Block: 4096 regular file > Device: fc02h/64514d Inode: 137925 Links: 1 > Access: (0444/-r--r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root) > Access: 2019-04-06 16:56:32.259721626 -0500 > Modify: 2018-12-25 17:02:43.753150336 -0600 > Change: 2018-12-25 17:02:43.753150336 -0600 > Birth: - > #+END_EXAMPLE > > It looks like the scheme file is fractions of a second newer than the > compiled file. So, pulling on this thread: These time stamps are wrong. Everything in /gnu/store should have 0 for the mtime. > 2. I feel like, regardless of the root-cause, some Guix command should > be able to correct this issue for me, without necessarily having to > know what went wrong or why. This shouldn=E2=80=99t ever happen, because all store items should have the= ir mtime reset. You previously mentioned that you modified your store (which =E2=80=9Cvoids= your warranty=E2=80=9D as it were); by default the store is bind-mounted to ensu= re that it is read-only. Can you tell us more about the file system and the way the store is mounted? -- Ricardo