From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 6BqCAr3us1/2cAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:39:41 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id YJ/pObzus1+ffQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:39:40 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7002B9402C8 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:39:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35286 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf351-0001oY-E6 for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:39:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54142) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf34n-0001o8-R4 for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:39:27 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:60157) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf34l-00078t-23 for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:39:25 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C69F08FCCD; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:39:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=03y47GzB7TAH6UHCP3ClUcG9TZQ=; b=XdeUNa qHws2oTFWGXOjZRTZwYx/9PBnAF/l5T6O8YkjnLMfIh7E84dBygCZ/Ner55XdHh7 cQk60oFD0Wa95bhMDRJsqRtr06TKSoRvqegNvDVCEWCn3IA59UyUiR8LaHgYZsv1 KmJ7gTfF69DQEQnzP5qZV9lAIFhqfphd+/j2Q= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD95E8FCCC; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:39:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=kyleam.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=QQCzfLboYk+7vAE6cYtTypVi5tzlrgxe/kBUCo1ExD8=; b=FEbVOIBqGonibmdeMYaOxn3CcoZGwK9sfi123u+eYHWcoyUBCFc81esLV15zJWPcgVUnEGFtlz6+i9zR4se2BN1SWQprJVsEKfXPrvSKqMapXXBZTxSGnS3GFSQ3GRi+DbxR7X5x0IIccYLlLagx3ShzUMMfIVvX6yc6OKfilGs= Received: from localhost (unknown [45.33.91.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2352D8FCCB; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:39:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com) From: Kyle Meyer To: zimoun Subject: Re: Workflow with mu4e + magit for sending patchsets to guix? In-Reply-To: <877dqkpv4t.fsf@kyleam.com> References: <87ima5f3mi.fsf@dustycloud.org> <86eeksq2v4.fsf@gmail.com> <877dqkpv4t.fsf@kyleam.com> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:39:19 -0500 Message-ID: <87k0uk3sd4.fsf@kyleam.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0F280946-28EB-11EB-A7DF-D152C8D8090B-24757444!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.108.70; envelope-from=kyle@kyleam.com; helo=pb-smtp1.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/17 10:39:20 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: help-guix@gnu.org Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=pobox.com header.s=sasl header.b=XdeUNa q; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=kyleam.com header.s=mesmtp header.b=FEbVOIBq; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.99 X-TUID: 0+VLhmAxpH0G Kyle Meyer writes: >> C-m l > > If you follow the convention of writing a cover letter only for > multi-patch series, you can drop the 'C-m l' because by default git will > generate a cover letter when there is more than one commit. Sorry, I was mistaken: generating a cover letter for a multi-patch series is _not_ git's default behavior. That requires setting format.coverLetter to "auto" in your git configuration.