From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Size of bare-bones guixsd Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:01:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87fupmo47v.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40496) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1behji-0001Aj-N1 for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:01:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1behjc-0003JM-Pq for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:01:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Vincent Legoll's message of "Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:48:16 +0200") List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Vincent Legoll Cc: help-guix Hi! Vincent Legoll skribis: > I'm wondering if there's interest in reducing the bare-bones system > footprint, there are some X / GUI stuff in there that may / could / > should be trimmed IMHO... > > And what would be the way to do this ? Sorry for the late reply. This would be interesting, and the starting point would be to look at the output of: guix size $(guix system build gnu/system/examples/bare-bones.tmpl) I think the X stuff is pulled by lsh. Ludo=E2=80=99.