From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: Re: guix gc,
	any way to delete only packages that aren't required to build
	anything?
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2018 00:14:58 +0100
Message-ID: <87ftvif98t.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
References: <20181129210707.3dbf5f5a@mailbox.org> <878t1b2lj1.fsf@elephly.net>
	<87a7lrgd30.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87mupqnwap.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49129)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1gSs09-0004d1-10
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:15:14 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1gSs00-0003ys-CN
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:15:10 -0500
Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:46759)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1gSrzz-0003xr-J1
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:15:04 -0500
In-reply-to: <87mupqnwap.fsf@netris.org>
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: help-guix@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


> Contrary to what Pierre wrote above, I've found that the use of these
> flags certainly does _not_ lead to an ever-growing store.

According to the discussion I linked above, The reason behind the ever-grow=
ing
store are substitutes.  So if you don't use them, then the store size shoul=
d be
stable indeed.

=2D-=20
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAlwBxHIACgkQm9z0l6S7
zH+D/AgAnThbwP0EJtg4A8KGFllkb2wWLDWdG6n41O+1yYBm0izZsPZlKcGj1e1e
jdFAxH8X++kPCt4T3pZ7N6FN6QggszeDhI0cC4lRVbXCEXgdA3YwqRk1tbwf11DW
JRSuQnVaRfHjg0hvNLn4C6at2I63uIQRX3S6dCtVjYbWO04ue/5VT6JKvNgAvKL4
P2SEkVvG/1/CfzbynU7sNWZZy2kU5F2OVku1+uufSPwu7hgAjSdibxc385A5/HEO
NWF/ZdLfPlgYuFeyf7zE4zahEYJVTWmwypuibyIxMo53WFX/XCxiL4O9tfHUwPGX
kLMBXkpiaEyqRfUUz71vX1Pax7PLRg==
=izwe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--