From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: enchant hash, fail to upgrade Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:25:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87ftkl1opm.fsf@nckx> References: <87a7awm8ze.fsf@dc.uba.ar> <87y2ygrm6o.fsf@dc.uba.ar> <9FCDF2CE-1390-47D2-B5F2-BC8B40E88037@lepiller.eu> <87sgon0zbb.fsf@nckx> <878sqdwn2w.fsf@dc.uba.ar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57889) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iCqS0-0000g1-5K for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:26:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCqRi-0002mM-R1 for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:26:08 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2001:470:7405::1]:46154) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCqRi-0002lb-9l for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:25:58 -0400 In-reply-to: <878sqdwn2w.fsf@dc.uba.ar> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Catriel Omar =?utf-8?Q?D'El=C3=ADa?= Cc: help-guix@gnu.org, julien lepiller --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Catriel, Catriel Omar D'El=C3=ADa =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: >> Enchant upstream[0] =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >>>> The original tarball is still available on >>>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/enchant2/enchant-2.2.5.tar.gz/. >>> >>> Thanks, but I'd rather not publish something I haven't >>> generated. What's the problem you're trying to solve here? > > vOv not shure I follow, that was Thomas? Yes? Describing @rrthomas as =E2=80=98enchant upstream=E2=80=99 seems corr= ect=20 based on recent commit history[1]. The =E2=80=98original tarball=E2=80=99 that @lantw44 mentions *was* generat= ed by=20 @rrthomas [2], so the latter's refusal to restore it makes no=20 sense to me. But the point is moot now :-) > ... anyway your commit fixed the issue! Huzzah! Thanks also to roptat, who discussed this issue in more=20 depth on IRC whenever I wasn't looking=E2=80=A6 Kind regards, T G-R [0]:=20 https://github.com/AbiWord/enchant/pull/221#issuecomment-528858811 [1]: https://github.com/AbiWord/enchant/commits [2]: Same hash=20 0iqwzs11i9fvqdxv5kn0svcn2mzymn657qf3j66lg8dx1nh4xkpz --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfo+u0AlEeO9y5k0W2Imw8BjFSTwFAl2KbaUACgkQ2Imw8BjF STwsQw//b32ytOFCtWdWPOy8qgHA/x9xpeS5z+wIiLyj4PQvRPIekDaLcpcYlttl yQKmwGNH72NfZ3zZf00lcqcF8H0uUB1fVqzYJJkcpOZgRWEPB0WiQfngqnuIkQ3m 5Gry3ETkm+8du9QXMBIHXSzpWXsdpJBQB9Awsa0PyfII9Ax6PNFjUz5wCuYj6VJn JfN1urFmSTsLO/q8eFOIfU3N0jTL/MHRJZj7CeWNfshqHajkEXgVhZ4KGLBARGjc sSVHo6c4dRi8FrHPT/ENmu9e3h50aRIkM09wCavkXCFMEcKrcLCk/V89IfZIFd4m 2PtAjLVByOxeHbfmLP/ePZg/TfcTYTEtOv7qPZDIMLL+SgEJHmSE88l/rJ7rjwy6 xPJFL3+FAIylJj+H7Wjy06wUYEbAz7Rw2RfZ4hLTe4AfXX1PgR1VA90xc7dPYT61 Zbo7jLEFnQIOazmtjlKsXCRdVQmi/QD4USLrund4Idma03iooP9kQLuls5f1sN5H TPDXUNvTA9h4jKkdU06OM+fyfIcaBuC7+FlzvMvw+5RsS7fjErwO7k1vR+wSviMF csHDQmoO0UZM5Ge8sUUW/TVIZtfRPHJraQOE1HquX9auEfU0GqsOR1pb22hbIBLO Q03Rzm5TVAR0edn+GE3SHRJM9AVwbmStSYpKa68XD3vW189i9RA= =IglU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--