From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id TFQeGgPFPl8IXQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 18:46:27 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id KKWQFQPFPl/vXgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 18:46:27 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF5C6940776 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 18:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42092 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8pZx-0000a5-O7 for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:46:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36730) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8pZe-0000XC-68 for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:46:06 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:56674) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8pZb-00043X-O3 for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:46:05 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D26351B01 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 20:46:01 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yo3Gq0YF3qQa for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 20:45:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Jorge P. de Morais Neto DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1597949159; bh=rbTdBng1Xo2w/NgfHEMStgUSHsHxifSRQ4Tosq6MudM=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=du38cn3IvQke0vFw2aI1mLg5UVaBXiUq8wfsAqjUjmUbnJ1Hz8rLVdMupeQN/b3Gp JC3OqkQ3rsp+Ochw7M3sSIC8Ln66nOFeY7xgt4V7mZUAupTFglJZViJgADBvBppDU2 DjdqK/YHFzc7yaemkDvR8Yq/h05vSY5eLiINTWdFye81KkHZ8bo/HQlJl/TjHFDN/S aKkoa2PeOe598D9vpN7Nqc2UQQw0eLkJxYG0e1X+z3lgNZgy4Ytl3DBUAUXzrYbPeS VyIrt/wYGz3qh0HMi4dVCbr7zazRH5erFKsN2urbkzCFFxbNccbo9ppAtdvXIl8NT0 bf+FthUkhpv2w== To: help-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: Guix's enchant misreports numerals on Debian---both buster and bullseye In-Reply-To: <87k0xtf9nv.fsf@disroot.org> References: <87k0xtf9nv.fsf@disroot.org> Mail-Followup-To: help-guix@gnu.org Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:45:56 -0300 Message-ID: <87eeo1f95n.fsf@disroot.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.21.23.139; envelope-from=jorge+list@disroot.org; helo=knopi.disroot.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/20 13:50:38 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=disroot.org header.s=mail header.b=du38cn3I; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=disroot.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.21 X-TUID: +sy9Uot//uoW Em [2020-08-20 qui 15:35:00-0300], Jorge P. de Morais Neto escreveu: > So enchant 2.2.8 (either from APT or from Guix) does not understand > "doesn't"; and, what's worse, enchant-2.2.8 from Guix reports every > numeral as a misspelling. I now reread my experiment and realized enchant from Guix does understand "doesn't". So enchant 2.2.8 from Guix gets "doesn't" correctly, but not numerals, and enchant 2.2.8 from APT gets numerals correctly, but not "doesn't". Could enchant get both numerals and "doesn't" correctly? That would be ideal. Failing that, APT's enchant situation is much preferable than Guix's enchant. Regards -- - - If an email of mine arrives at your spam box, please notify me. - Please adopt free/libre formats like PDF, ODF, Org, LaTeX, Opus, WebM and 7z. - Free/libre software for Replicant, LineageOS and Android: https://f-droid.org - [[https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html][What is free software?]]