From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id UGXwJ25Y0V5WLQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 18:46:06 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 6Bf1I25Y0V60YAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 18:46:06 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 421349402D6 for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 18:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51398 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jek17-00056l-8f for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:46:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52506) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jejd1-0007XY-Mv for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:21:11 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45209) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jejd1-0001k9-Be; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:21:11 -0400 Received: from ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no ([84.202.68.75]:43860 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jejd0-0002Ug-Lg; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:21:11 -0400 From: Marius Bakke To: Leo Famulari , Stephen Scheck Subject: Re: Guix Docker image inflation In-Reply-To: <20200529180245.GA3754@jasmine.lan> References: <20200528181043.GC23745@jasmine.lan> <20200529170820.GA30828@jasmine.lan> <20200529180245.GA3754@jasmine.lan> Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 20:21:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87d06m4n6z.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 29 May 2020 14:45:56 -0400 X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: help-guix Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.11 X-TUID: kpETBQqX6k+h --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Leo Famulari writes: >> How else would you suggest that it be done? It would be nice if `guix >> system docker-image` >> took `--branch` and `--commit` options to build a container from a >> well-defined Guix check-in >> state, but that doesn't seem to be the case. And in any case - too slow. >> The point here is to >> leverage daily incremental pulls to keep data transfer and build times down. > > --branch and --commit would be passed to `guix pull`, and then you'd run > `guix system docker-image` based on that. There is also 'guix time-machine --commit=abc123 -- system docker-image'. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl7RUpQACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPqBfQgAlm2NJaEKbmDQGhFicGfa8SRYxC0L9gMEM9aeCgDy5BQ5XECF3iAp1ElN AF+HBNqlxXTgxgeiVFXI0dT2u/ELz5F2cgcNwiRU/pS+cTSfnwcuGOwhdHjAtKXO u813rUFZZ35fkoehFBsBajPdEs/aLAsnmXGW/bSLvsRaOnBeBT3gcZOdKkSPpyCo aC9JS/8/KMp6seaC993AF4045DC27G6bsHlA18tX4I2zd8/UPdue87OCnW6sUdzX /3k8Pd3dWayrd/V53YExiWepMeb76PrXROh+PjAc2wAR+8XpdBaP7DukKwCgLcRW HBpnLstC0WMuRQp5ychVRpsDEk5N8g== =TVCn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--