From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id aFg7O0Xa2GAxXQEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 22:06:29 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id WPXfNkXa2GCkHgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 20:06:29 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D48C28699 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 22:06:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49132 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lxb2x-00021i-8l for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 16:06:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55910) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lxb2j-00021a-LU for help-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 16:06:13 -0400 Received: from sender4-op-o11.zoho.com ([136.143.188.11]:17108) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lxb2h-0004gf-Iz for help-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 16:06:13 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1624824360; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=W8NLlJo+4Zfh7qFanfier+yix7A9PAUacKv1wxglBWnwqnZSCD+tpoggRXp9RT1Yk5TC+h2ViSqP22IOmMLN4BvyxulUKYL8aKccuHWOJIYJzq5k/2dTfOENh6TV//0CRnPTMSXjKLK4Hxnan2fhH3TIs5AiyzK/Hn1ttRXYCyw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1624824360; h=Content-Type:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=e6y1lwm82by6zfWEj+p8BgK2jLh1fhWWdr18GAY+PzY=; b=OTX+WpKAUAc/cac8N1+1D9r1u4qPkemdMhsJOEqYNoDLwxMYEgKW+JW9tA0J6rFgGPWV/D+Iq63ypNlkR/c3EqCqHe2LEkHCAUzQmvqGEQe3Zegr9Qp3REBv/VUnC01el6S5H1l1+jJMvjH+kxJwl5JjgkLO9Hs5i2xx+SDBTJs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=rdklein.fr; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=edou@rdklein.fr; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1624824360; s=zoho; d=rdklein.fr; i=edou@rdklein.fr; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=e6y1lwm82by6zfWEj+p8BgK2jLh1fhWWdr18GAY+PzY=; b=ceyqt913FDJhr2uULA5ObUlSxKweQ9/WsL4iqCbfbWXGSPcWfbAKWG+zQhz5FMy4 U8ATKlFytJXpq6UjyUgQkWdzuzUT7Sh3esY8kmKivzsb5SIRCkZiV1KZKQR2bx5p0US ZvRN5eL0aEfRD76xyQsVr/dlD5t7NCuZQ/NERkbE= Received: from Rasoir (lfbn-idf3-1-600-168.w86-252.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.252.177.168]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1624824356325769.6446528692493; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 13:05:56 -0700 (PDT) References: <87y2azyw0g.fsf@disroot.org> <87fsx686kv.fsf@rdklein.fr> <871r8px48s.fsf@dismail.de> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.15; emacs 27.2 From: Edouard Klein To: Joshua Branson Subject: Re: package manager guix on Windows and OSX In-reply-to: <871r8px48s.fsf@dismail.de> Message-ID: <87czs7844u.fsf@rdklein.fr> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 22:05:37 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-ZohoMailClient: External Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.11; envelope-from=edou@rdklein.fr; helo=sender4-op-o11.zoho.com X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: help-guix@gnu.org Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1624824389; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=e6y1lwm82by6zfWEj+p8BgK2jLh1fhWWdr18GAY+PzY=; b=C0d56RI1kenOmsp0j4KRXvz5Ql69VnFGYcfceJ2v/sdnLH5YTtxyRTWJguqeuGmATqSL37 HpmZ75mSJdjOLs+tBPNItOB7uN9UUtd1fbeykEE3yESGjVSTR+1YV/Or/UXAT7+10YjnF4 gSbmrw8ipwDu9XOfBmJ8yewXFt94rkLrPSd3smqux4glHjjabvMcZpgJNC4SOfERvrF/5b FFH5vD9xYhZTZTs2VLONJPihziurnFRBCpTSH0zgMv0JLIFD76iCvQgCO6t8a222sulBq8 sIoyUi3L5kXkChx0UlZDlf0L/4peTbnLeH4TTwFpzIcRYRznaRrunHxJiQdZpg== ARC-Seal: i=2; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1624824389; a=rsa-sha256; cv=fail; b=ca54NR6HTw3q3CxuMaExSDL4bX6ej2yc2cpzxR9kH2eg7MnR5h9dV2jWUnW8BeyuFaNXAU JZj0hLmXfE90k+3Ef/e1O/VbhXkKH3vnmEmUXhTW+cahPQZl2C5sLA4HebYwYNzHPDE54V akZlBeb+LFBL0fJiYYI2R1WDD8I05nyMpF/RRrEs1hOgEK9FLILzRDEJP98jaFJy65PzIC XHspr5FEwLxvlWgtNc+VmsmFjArmNpjAKR0cvL1xfrG4zoVtNpsvgzqoVyzLlw7icHXgAE mt5uBWIR+NQiSbvLED8GsRKau2PBJp1PqDsipHGXbCIEPdMl9vQfmnlEnho82w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=rdklein.fr header.s=zoho header.b=ceyqt913; arc=reject ("signature check failed: fail, {[1] = sig:zohomail.com:reject}"); dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 1.07 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=rdklein.fr header.s=zoho header.b=ceyqt913; arc=reject ("signature check failed: fail, {[1] = sig:zohomail.com:reject}"); dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4D48C28699 X-Spam-Score: 1.07 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: vB92H4qEhxgb > > Why Plan 9? May I ask? Plan 9 is awesome. What the whole industry is barely managing to achieve with containers and VMs, Guix does somewhat correctly with namespaces, but Plan 9 had all this in its DNA, in a cleaner implementation 30 years ago ! By default, a process in Plan 9 only has a partial view of the system, and is truly isolated from the other processes. No network, user, filesytem namespace bullshit, everything (yes everything is a file), so there is only one namespace, the filesystem namespace, and you mount only what your process needs to see. e.g . your process does not need to access the internet, then don't mount /net ! e.t. your process need to access only one host: the connect to the host, and mount the relevant /net/tcp/n/ directory, but not /net/tcp/clone, and so your process will not be able to connect anywhere else ! Also, any file could be managed by a process running on another machine, transparently. Anyway, Guix reminds me of Plan9 because it achieves like 10% of what Plan9 could do, but on a Kernel that actually runs on modern hardware, and with a sane API, and so it's 10 times better than anything else. Yet I wish Linux was more plan9ish. > And I do really like the Hurd, but I use the > dvorak keyboard layout. My understanding is that the Hurd does not > support variant keyboard layouts yet... :( I don't think that the kernel is the part where your keyboard layout is implemented, but I don't know the Hurd at all so I may well > > I actually think that the Guix developers may want to consider a port to > the OpenBSD kernel, provided that the Hyperbola developers get > HyperbolaBSD working. Though I guess the Debian guys sort of did > already. :) OpenBSD is really good too. The pledge() function is a really nice API that is much easier to use than the mess we got on Linux...