From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: ASDF 2 and 3 Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 11:53:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87a88yvfq1.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckqGo-0007cS-RV for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 05:53:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckqGo-0005Uy-1q for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 05:53:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Jack Lucas's message of "Sun, 19 Feb 2017 16:38:56 -0500") List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Jack Lucas Cc: Andy Patterson , "help-guix@gnu.org" Hello, Jack Lucas skribis: > I really don't know how to describe this issue. I can't actually pinpoint= where the problem is even though I've spent almost all day pulling my hair= out > over it. > > When installing CCL guix will pull version 1.11 from the server to instal= l. Version 1.11 is built with ASDF3.1.5 but after installing and loading it= up > using (require "asdf"), (in-package :asdf) and finally *asdf-version* it = says it has ASDF 2.26. > > So I guess what I am asking for help with is I have poured over the CCL d= efinition in guix, and every single asdf related file in the guix tree. I s= ee > absolutely no reasoning for this would change from 3.1.5 -> 2.26.=20 > > I've tried grepping for any other LISP directories or asfd.lisp's. And no= thing exists. > > I'm fine with trying to work around it I just want to make sure guix isn'= t doing some backround magic to force ASDF 2.26 on everything. I don=E2=80=99t know what the problem is, but Andy (Cc=E2=80=99d) may have = an answer. Andy? Thanks for reporting the issue. Ludo=E2=80=99.