From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: myglc2@gmail.com Subject: Re: [ANN] Emacs-Guix 0.4 Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 21:02:39 -0400 Message-ID: <87a7so35u8.fsf@g1.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <878t8f7qfk.fsf@gmail.com> <87y3gekkdu.fsf@gmail.com> <8736yixucx.fsf@gnu.org> <874liygt8b.fsf@gmail.com> <87y3g9uu3f.fsf@gnu.org> <87muwphsvn.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58960) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fM184-0008Cu-MY for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 21:02:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fM17z-0006Em-4O for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 21:02:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87muwphsvn.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Thu, 24 May 2018 20:21:16 +0300") List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Alex Kost Cc: help-guix@gnu.org Hi Alex, Thank you for this new release. I am enjoying the cool new features! On 05/24/2018 at 20:21 Alex Kost writes: [...] > I recalled that C-u prefix is already occupied by specifying an > arbitrary profile for the package commands. So, I'm afraid instead of > "C-u M-x guix-dependent-packages" there will be "M-x > guix-direct-dependent-packages". > > Or maybe I should just break this dull "convention" (I mean "C-u" for > profiles) as probably no one uses it anyway :-) +1 FWIW, ISTM this use of "C-u" is more global than typical and thus feels a bit counter-intuitive. Since you have made it very easy to jump between profiles in *Guix Profiles* I think it would be good to switch to using "C-u" for more command-specific modifications. This might also help avoid "function bloat in emacs-guix." HTH - George