From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id SDZ8KIo9q2BllgAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 07:45:46 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 8JgCJIo9q2CcBQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 05:45:46 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 088FC1661B for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 07:45:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45750 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ll3PL-0005NP-9i for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 01:45:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43704) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ll3P0-0005N0-9C for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 01:45:22 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:45045) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ll3Ox-0000tf-FN for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 01:45:22 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 5aed8e60; Mon, 24 May 2021 07:45:13 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=20190914; bh=PtoPH0/eKHwDUDtjUdcOSWIYBPM9yWJLGL 3QDLfRKac=; b=UEqu3OLuWOoH6DkdqTXoXghDGqgSG/h383g6C/EU2Taa09gZSV 6tMQNv6pe1welAP9iOiSyCU3alc0PJE3epBLF1GCcNY/y9HnLsTUupz09vM0afpF MnScsGX/gXfGbT2/9+sYWIye0xxLsCKxHSJvRbpjMG/xmACES/mMk6eEEBheggG1 Zaf6N1JTWEZqzocvAqxsqEoTUyDumGi4Z5Nklai3zoRoL/PrjO/FtOi5Tw12N3xD EAWaJ2AB/gYXNDFxZfCjj/rXpKgpEuaRayWGALyHJqHxSq6RBR9bMSqeT5dlf4zX gXbmjEI7vgQgZ/MW/2YwVR5pXjoDLSpYVA5w== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 65859b30; Mon, 24 May 2021 07:45:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 56efee8a; Mon, 24 May 2021 07:45:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 64381e74 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 24 May 2021 07:45:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Joshua Branson To: c4droid Cc: help-guix@gnu.org, busybox@busybox.net Subject: Re: Pack busybox using guix, but make check have fail tests References: Mail-Followup-To: c4droid , help-guix@gnu.org, busybox@busybox.net Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 01:45:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: (c4droid@foxmail.com's message of "Wed, 19 May 2021 23:00:48 +0800") Message-ID: <87a6ok8z2y.fsf@dismail.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=78.46.223.134; envelope-from=jbranso@dismail.de; helo=mx1.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1621835146; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=48e3s/Qqv7GCIHqpDpDEXFDvRut0B3NMLL2iZ/Qi9c0=; b=ghQRvvT/AhZ6F48XXtnGysn9SEnLtGhcbg3obAlcQr3D6YbWFZQ+nu36cwqYSwidNBjMzT GXSUPqgJFzBku2edXytcwMFRXAzlyelwlmWBnD3ttshKYD1yLKNyIMqE0mhd+kgXA70F8d DFl2/kxELtGoyTvgw8HMA/z5c8yPSEPVGECcIBcMbziiAt9wGst7+GC1ge3WSDzuNgEd+J AtWCjogBgtA7HggnvXBqiX8UCye9K7GDO2j/wHQDOQxNhJGVZya0nMdZpnth5AMtLqWbbO jHtxdhntr3XxmoHqFhI8DH3tAtbWVScGtI1wvZJtq/F2TJ7r/lRIYUyl+2KhVg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1621835146; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=TiiBwrTfFH7HEkNM8ycqLJiK383Z2x1iibaTwoZdlcWaNXOqdhu7l19Al6qkofmvn/5Fa7 pQGtPR1ZH7o4xP/R9UKK845In2hN1vEEtJNvfP7mE+HxzmXjLpZ2kUn1GsbGSG7WhYR4hP YpJetKNZcpMDIGhrG8iKKCIo1HP+iE6KpJRnp2nL+ena9oa0d8rVrrAK3MSs1HO0P9lsBl cWPZvPo9up7h7QMVKGfTpZV6qccIJpVfYhcKKesCG+FOllGYpySAYf+NDj5UIOwlNSuo0Q azA2MoHBu2zWnI8pESnkFxFIgXwRZJKaKPqQzIhLdjV8oOx5ni0jfcpjbghn6g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=UEqu3OLu; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 2.86 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=UEqu3OLu; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 088FC1661B X-Spam-Score: 2.86 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: rwLfSW91X0ey c4droid writes: > Hi, > > I'm working on the using busybox to provide the guix bootstrap recipes > for my building Linux From Scratch system using GNU Guix projects. when > I pack the busybox using guix, I copy the original package definitions > from gnu/packages/busybox.scm, I add enable-static-link build phases to > make busybox static linked. At building test, guix can build busybox > perfectly, but at running test suites, I got test failed about mdev > components, I check guix original package definitions for busybox, build > it, mdev test suites is skipped, I don't know how to skip the mdev test > suites, hope get some guidence for skip the mdev test suites, thanks. :) > > My busybox package definitions is at https://github.com/c4dr01d/guix-lfs-bootstrap/blob/master/lfs/packages/busybox.scm AWESOME! Thanks for working on this! Best of luck! I am commenting just because. I'm a guix contributor not a developer, so please take my words with a grain of salt. :) I believe that busybox has a more permissive license than coreutils? Is that true? I think I heard rms suggest that one should develop for coreutils more than busybox. Someone please correct me if I am mistaken in some way. Anyway, great job! And best of luck! -- Joshua Branson (joshuaBPMan in #guix) Sent from Emacs and Gnus https://gnucode.me https://video.hardlimit.com/accounts/joshua_branson/video-channels https://propernaming.org "You can have whatever you want, as long as you help enough other people get what they want." - Zig Ziglar