From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: [ANN] Emacs-Guix 0.4 Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 22:59:12 +0300 Message-ID: <877enrh5gv.fsf@gmail.com> References: <878t8f7qfk.fsf@gmail.com> <87y3gekkdu.fsf@gmail.com> <8736yixucx.fsf@gnu.org> <874liygt8b.fsf@gmail.com> <87y3g9uu3f.fsf@gnu.org> <87muwphsvn.fsf@gmail.com> <87a7so35u8.fsf@g1.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47828) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fMIru-0004lK-It for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 15:59:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fMIrp-0005jt-QA for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 15:59:18 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x242.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::242]:52115) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fMIrp-0005iO-IB for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 15:59:13 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x242.google.com with SMTP id j4-v6so17234420wme.1 for ; Fri, 25 May 2018 12:59:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87a7so35u8.fsf@g1.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (myglc2@gmail.com's message of "Thu, 24 May 2018 21:02:39 -0400") List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: myglc2@gmail.com Cc: help-guix@gnu.org myglc2@gmail.com (2018-05-24 21:02 -0400) wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Thank you for this new release. I am enjoying the cool new features! > > On 05/24/2018 at 20:21 Alex Kost writes: > > [...] > >> I recalled that C-u prefix is already occupied by specifying an >> arbitrary profile for the package commands. So, I'm afraid instead of >> "C-u M-x guix-dependent-packages" there will be "M-x >> guix-direct-dependent-packages". >> >> Or maybe I should just break this dull "convention" (I mean "C-u" for >> profiles) as probably no one uses it anyway :-) > > +1 > > FWIW, ISTM this use of "C-u" is more global than typical and thus feels > a bit counter-intuitive. Since you have made it very easy to jump > between profiles in *Guix Profiles* I think it would be good to switch > to using "C-u" for more command-specific modifications. This might also > help avoid "function bloat in emacs-guix." I agree. Although I decided to make another solution for this case: "M-x guix-dependent-packages" will ask you for the "dependent type" in the minibuffer: "all" (default) or "direct". -- Alex