From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Giovanni Biscuolo Subject: binary nix install alongside guix on foreign distro Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 18:42:45 +0100 Message-ID: <875zuz9hbe.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52805) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ggvPA-0003sv-P3 for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2019 12:43:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ggvP9-0003dw-0F for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2019 12:43:08 -0500 Received: from ns13.heimat.it ([46.4.214.66]:41516) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ggvP8-0003Jj-Lh for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2019 12:43:06 -0500 Received: from localhost (ip6-localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns13.heimat.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D10300680 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 17:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns13.heimat.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns13.heimat.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NU1q_CV9pUsp for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 17:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bourrache.mug.xelera.it (unknown [93.56.161.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ns13.heimat.it (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 058A63000D3 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 17:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from roquette.mug.biscuolo.net (roquette.mug.biscuolo.net [10.38.2.14]) by bourrache.mug.xelera.it (Postfix) with SMTP id DE2C5300056 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 18:42:45 +0100 (CET) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: help-guix@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I'd like to test nix alongside guix, both installed on a foreign distro (Debian in my case) is someone in this list testing a similar configuration? is there any danger in mixing both package manager (and the foregin distro one) on a single system? AFAIK stores, profiles and builders are separated, so they do not overlap... and I do not see any other caveat in a similar config... but I'm a little bit afraid :-O (the host I'll use for testing is also my daily work workstation) any comment on this will be very wellcome thanks Giovanni =2D-=20 Giovanni Biscuolo Xelera IT Infrastructures --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEERcxjuFJYydVfNLI5030Op87MORIFAlw04RUACgkQ030Op87M ORKnFQ/+N3biEl+3s+5nebZcR/4gzkVE0Y+x0LMQRveaHNtiWErN43V3AaRq2ATQ QhL+mXM4wENfDy54aBYUjl0i16KSE89PKPSqRXcEk7KmWShXdga7XIZWpv0eAZFO cK5nyEdpm9enBPBxLH8Oby/91h8Nw4GSLVxhZjUAY2i5FU2FXsRqSzRQbLOt1XzL yPDQ6EShGTf5Q15wy0SOHlDg2VeTXobXD7Voil97uYmnCoMB4IVwFoVg8T9WPyES Bx3G/+/1UpWzVMi4svhPaCaDicIy2Vh3KpS39ehl9gbKZoBF3TqQqYU6NHi34/Bg d3PJjoq7qq2+9n3lFn5fZjEJ8XbfvqqbxB9bq7zDi0G+0EGSzZ1e0VavnfLUvJyh nAUHO1WWYXOqLvRBjsE6HnB5hEML742ygjGSZL1CdZJx3JSegq5A0IBSv7jaCTC1 +1KlEkG3PLdXCEMnxF6oC4SuFxZ14AgHWOkR1B9nxDRtdbh4Yyl1IpzhgCcH6J9n 7A8QIagLTLnK1kGHWYrkTakXjGwazrds/44SJ+tl0vhKFNR8ybLlDAqDfBFnkgAa hypkSVfm1zklUQ/vkgWeu5+idgsK1YyqTce0EW+/nAttlKz0CvZrjHIC0PMKuHkg 7GZNKPLE3bwq9NhoZS1eZTMaypTBxGGA0OSIzKHwMMSR0zSO7YE= =LLKi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--