From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Reproducible bootstrapping Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 17:31:20 +0200 Message-ID: <874m85ctdj.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41296) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bK5qK-0002x0-K4 for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2016 11:31:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bK5qF-00077b-KQ for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2016 11:31:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: (t3sserakt's message of "Mon, 04 Jul 2016 16:00:19 +0200") List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: t3sserakt Cc: help-guix@gnu.org Hi, t3sserakt skribis: > are the bootstrap binaries reproducible? Yes, in the sense of . Does that answer your question? Ludo=E2=80=99.