From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: collect2: fatal error: cannot find 'ld'
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:55:05 +0100
Message-ID: <874l8v4y3q.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <LYHFyoS--3-1@tutanota.com> <87wom9kp1q.fsf@elephly.net>
	<CAJ3okZ1MZWT6sxzFgv+Op9wGsHL-wvqROMPRz5B_QpXMkYE_fQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87r2celejh.fsf@elephly.net> <87va1pgdn0.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87tvh8ir2d.fsf@elephly.net>
	<CAJ3okZ02Gjt3LkDk8fgs8pEuHkfs1SU9t8tDRhqRWApBfjdVcw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36442)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1gxDBe-0001G8-I7
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:56:31 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1gxDBP-0002Xe-9P
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:56:17 -0500
In-reply-to: <CAJ3okZ02Gjt3LkDk8fgs8pEuHkfs1SU9t8tDRhqRWApBfjdVcw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Cc: Help Guix <help-guix@gnu.org>


Hi Simon,

> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 23:24, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:
>
>> Is this the right way to hide the package (see patch)?  I searched for
>> GCC on the command line with =E2=80=9Cguix package --search=3Dgcc=E2=80=
=9D and the results
>> did not include the plain gcc packages.
>
> The `hidden-package` function, is it documented somewhere?
> I mean more than the docstring in packages.scm. ;-)

I don=E2=80=99t think it is documented elsewhere.  It=E2=80=99s purpose is =
to hide the
package from the command line interface.

--=20
Ricardo