From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: Next browser finally on master!
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 21:29:54 +0100
Message-ID: <8736qttg3h.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <87in085kk2.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87woo5y6yq.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87woo5mjzt.fsf@posteo.net> <877eg5jq3s.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38769)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1gZij6-0002vr-06
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:46:15 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1gZiip-0000pR-0X
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:45:55 -0500
Received: from sender-of-o53.zoho.com ([135.84.80.218]:21811)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1gZiio-0000i5-8e
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:45:38 -0500
In-reply-to: <877eg5jq3s.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: help-guix <help-guix@gnu.org>


Hi Pierre,

>> I am also in favor
>> of renaming SBCL-Next to something else. I know that we are using sbcl
>> instead of clisp for building it, but the naming scheme seems to imply
>> an SBCL library or module rather than a web browser application.
>
> This is being discussed for stumpwm in bug #33311. [=E2=80=A6]

I=E2=80=99ve read that discussion, but I don=E2=80=99t see how it is releva=
nt.
The *name* of the package surely does not have any effect on the
features, does it?

For applications like StumpWM and Next we could change the package names
to =E2=80=9Cstumpwm=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9Cnext=E2=80=9D, respectively.  Tha=
t these packages can *also*
be used as libraries does not mean that the packages should have names
with the =E2=80=9Csbcl-=E2=80=9D or =E2=80=9Ccl-=E2=80=9D or =E2=80=9Cother=
-lisp-=E2=80=9D prefix.

Am I misunderstanding something?

--
Ricardo