From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: emacs-guix invalid byte opcode: op=183 ptr=25
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 20:03:46 +0100
Message-ID: <8736o7zqel.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <20190228.192814.35659745992274650.kumagusu08@gmail.com>
	<87ef7sqjvz.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
	<CAJ3okZ2CC5c__BC6Tbz858wrrWvXXZgHf_DZfK6O=e2AdbWMuw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56412)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1gzQyU-0006eE-An
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 14:04:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1gzQyS-0008EE-UE
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 14:04:06 -0500
Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21119)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1gzQyM-0008BI-PE
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 14:04:00 -0500
In-reply-to: <CAJ3okZ2CC5c__BC6Tbz858wrrWvXXZgHf_DZfK6O=e2AdbWMuw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Cc: help-guix <help-guix@gnu.org>


zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:

> I am confused and I have a really naive question. :-)
>
> When `guix package -i emacs-stuff', well the `emacs-stuff` is built or
> if it is available on a substitute then the package is pulled from
> there.
> So,
>      a- does it pull the ".el" files and then byte-compile them locally?
> Or b- does it pull the ".elc" byte-compiled on the substitute?

The files are byte-compiled as part of the build process, so the elc
files are part of the substitute.

-- 
Ricardo