From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Love Subject: Re: fixing --check saying outputs not valid Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:31:43 +0100 Message-ID: <871sndmsq8.fsf@albion.it.manchester.ac.uk> References: <87bmmlpm8m.fsf@albion.it.manchester.ac.uk> <87wp589afc.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33674) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drM0L-0008Ug-4F for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 06:31:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drM0I-0003Bk-0m for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 06:31:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wp589afc.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?Court\=E8s\?\= \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?\=22's\?\= message of "Fri, 8 Sep 2017 22:56:23 +0200") List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: help-guix@gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > To run --check, you must first already have the store item(s) available. > > So you would first run: > > guix build hwloc > > which will ensure both hwloc and hwloc:lib are in your store, possibly > by downloading substitutes. > > Then you can run =E2=80=9Cguix build hwloc --check -L --no-grafts=E2=80= =9D, which will > build hwloc locally and raise an error if hwloc:{out,lib} are not > bit-identical to what you had in store. [Should that be documented as the procedure to use?] The trouble is that I don't get a second build with --check: $ ./pre-inst-env guix build hwloc --check -L --no-grafts guile: warning: failed to install locale warning: failed to install locale: Invalid argument @ build-started /gnu/store/7d2lk82ak7n0awbr1k5bllwfc43dicsl-hwloc-1.11.8.= drv - x86_64-linux /var/log/guix/drvs/7d//2lk82ak7n0awbr1k5bllwfc43dicsl-hw= loc-1.11.8.drv.bz2 grafting '/gnu/store/n2l4ryq1572wnfh4yxljjbh2q40v6jr0-hwloc-1.11.8-debug'= -> '/gnu/store/dgfpcmkx7wzxjj3d1q6l5dmzjr9z6wz5-hwloc-1.11.8-debug'... grafting '/gnu/store/hf6k2i6aqqs50p181bs1aa7xw49kd6xn-hwloc-1.11.8-lib' -= > '/gnu/store/jrxiynx443d894and51pa8bylaib0bkc-hwloc-1.11.8-lib'... grafting '/gnu/store/f969ab3pfvgn28xc812h97jsyif2z5vs-hwloc-1.11.8' -> '/= gnu/store/2mind69xpdx8wv6ixmjix0f12dd2qb2v-hwloc-1.11.8'... /gnu/store/dgfpcmkx7wzxjj3d1q6l5dmzjr9z6wz5-hwloc-1.11.8-debug /gnu/store/jrxiynx443d894and51pa8bylaib0bkc-hwloc-1.11.8-lib /gnu/store/2mind69xpdx8wv6ixmjix0f12dd2qb2v-hwloc-1.11.8 > Makes sense? > > (The =E2=80=9C--no-grafts=E2=80=9D part is because what you care about is= the actual > build of hwloc, not the grafting derivation.) > > Ludo=E2=80=99.