From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id gESXOljd4V/sHgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:49:44 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id UCBjNljd4V/YVwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:49:44 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 567CC940367 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58052 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1krgAh-0002p4-AJ for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 06:49:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50380) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1krgAR-0002ow-4W for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 06:49:27 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]:32885) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1krgAO-0004J4-Sh for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 06:49:26 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id t30so14280622wrb.0 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 03:49:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=R3TCFx9vm2LFrHfhWpj5j7nVavw7YgqEZjAc5+mez4o=; b=npw+rnhco0DeMYP0tn8sg5LcTlVUGUsNPrI29fC6V6n6LhDNpgFfJSW8wJCvIFfbw9 jqwpxjpiffyEDMbtwXkAmtodIYzOdWFdujYmqdb8w6VafkNrn04hFDRKOhsONuZ7wll1 EBs+Erbf0smlG+UbUry5RAR64VfCwYZ2Z3lGC8//BTnpDk3EgpzUCzSvm1lB5bgdY2te OhuR4eBNoIX3IrA9Q11ngm8OO8S446afFAagoiyJ4TH9YwsTBVlV+20099eXDS8NqbEg rdh82Q5felndlZZ3yQNrOTwQ0UCalfK0+B9yefJT0OjC+Vas2OK6FqOXhjiS6tOU2KUw pL6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=R3TCFx9vm2LFrHfhWpj5j7nVavw7YgqEZjAc5+mez4o=; b=rVL6+2d9EGvTIMvGEbK+inqLz7YjDHJirBl+w4Oq49gnRe0jPoTO1l2KM9xGweD8C6 /q/Cx4XApT5pJQnk7lpDIFNk37kxI6D1cB4KaFfmKuiGEJFJPy7gCoz4kvz850wetay9 1eyCDvsHjx3e62ABzL9rtFQjESfISchlamW8Svl0Hfaa1AYBdHnL4gC1gSfujCjwBx4W VOV54yUpJ2J8EhgFh9MmN4oOg2hJM1COWlR8G4/yIY5Zia7o4elF0/LL2ro2MUPKXhnn frI5eNbwmH29FAJWO+Z9DMLNObN1MBSnK4Qtq6UHC1O6TTp3VUFXd/pfXiQJHrOcPcBS s/Qw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ZQG/YBkza2e/x8AJ/CRAOEriZHc7p9UtftGEHcSAzw9vyuW22 TkhWL0veC3ldSsxFIdTPHpjdocckwc8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5iDvafflBTAICOuufIwiwcKmcX2Y1PSb2ZmjE2QGNzpZLDQjgKlrj9eZLenZ4zqbcegESfg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e5c7:: with SMTP id a7mr23807846wrn.300.1608637763340; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 03:49:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili (oul69-1-82-232-2-3.fbx.proxad.net. [82.232.2.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h16sm30671893wrq.29.2020.12.22.03.49.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 22 Dec 2020 03:49:22 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: Phil Subject: Re: guix pull only from private channel In-Reply-To: <858s9qxkah.fsf@beadling.co.uk> References: <85czzbx878.fsf@beadling.co.uk> <85bleqx9mo.fsf@beadling.co.uk> <86wnxb9wxh.fsf@gmail.com> <858s9qxkah.fsf@beadling.co.uk> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 12:44:09 +0100 Message-ID: <86im8u83qu.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42a; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42a.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: help-guix Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.02 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=npw+rnhc; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 567CC940367 X-Spam-Score: -3.02 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: zP1zDmaRne3/ Hi, On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 09:27, Phil wrote: > Yep this is what I've ended up doing - but am still a bit surprised that > even with a pinned guix commit id, and a private channel containing a > single trivial package with available substitute, doing a 'git pull' is > still fairly expensive (approx 1min). This is quicker than pulling > latest guix, of course - so there is some improvement. I agree. Some optimizations could be done, maybe by cutting some unnecessary computations or check. > Personally I think GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH still serves some practical > purpose, which is not as well covered by channels? Personally, I do not use GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH for local packages but the option =E2=80=99--load-path=E2=80=99 when I need it. All the best, simon