From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4AjnIGH3l2FcVQEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 20:13:37 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id oBiPHGH3l2FzTgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 19:13:37 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAE318728 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 20:13:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43932 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mo9KI-0004eQ-SF for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:13:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51742) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mo9HF-0003jL-UY for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:10:27 -0500 Received: from dog.birch.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.209.48]:14394) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mo9HB-0007Ew-TE for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:10:25 -0500 X-Sender-Id: instrampxe0y3a|x-authuser|paul@teulu.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318BF8810D1 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 19:09:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cpanel-008-lon.hostingww.com (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: instrampxe0y3a) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 39DC4880BC8 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 19:09:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: instrampxe0y3a|x-authuser|paul@teulu.org Received: from cpanel-008-lon.hostingww.com (cpanel-008-lon.hostingww.com [35.177.91.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.120.81.154 (trex/6.4.3); Fri, 19 Nov 2021 19:09:35 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: instrampxe0y3a|x-authuser|paul@teulu.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: instrampxe0y3a X-Whimsical-Oafish: 5c056f8a2faccca8_1637348974740_2062356746 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1637348974739:385525263 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1637348974739 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=teulu.org; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version: Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=6yguLfbynf63e36JYaU4PFBpDcfpCO9alm8xO0x36Kw=; b=XZ2lTkblxG9PoBesUTmXgCh6VM RlyNmCS9R90JmxVQjK2SL8NoQSC4qvp4vYDP1KrtYzNmRrWKD+5AwHgRbTJol5NTm617rEF8XRp6D k7NC5bK4xqTmrGKSh4L3HKgBydZeI4ff/VA64kP7EaoKfzKXD5/vr1Kn2gjRVQ+O7GqMvYCw+Yz9D k6Kn9MzGc5q4DLiD91N76JEJlva5S8SmfXD3Sp6q1u7clTo+13LVsUzqPc6eBp0n1OIt0PHwMb50p vYjwD7/dby7YcdhRS/H/l+iU0FRRH3wZpFLwE1DT7w/vdNrDr+hz8wp5/29kKGFHjYomi3RFgolct dTR2Wvdg==; Received: from 67.26.169.217.in-addr.arpa ([217.169.26.67]:45888 helo=[192.168.1.193]) by cpanel-008-lon.hostingww.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mo9GO-0007MK-8M for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 06:09:32 +1100 Subject: Re: Running Out of Inodes To: help-guix@gnu.org References: <833262586.1528194.1636888480202.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1130025702.1609631.1636915674887@mail.yahoo.com> <3015580.4H8PAEmHYN@popigai> <1058476678.2171450.1637050446261@mail.yahoo.com> From: Paul Jewell Message-ID: <72502e63-f7c7-cfb9-ee1b-90b3c10ff3a7@teulu.org> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 19:09:28 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1058476678.2171450.1637050446261@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AuthUser: paul@teulu.org Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=23.83.209.48; envelope-from=paul@teulu.org; helo=dog.birch.relay.mailchannels.net X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.727, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1637349217; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=6yguLfbynf63e36JYaU4PFBpDcfpCO9alm8xO0x36Kw=; b=Cdo2K720CRVubvGolnqPTSTbuihYZG7OKKaKV1erC94xWSwTXHJmHWrygTgYi41Sz/fISW 6YhGMbGSsR1G+Juhv4lX8Jk3avbd4VPKUOK7ky2ZFW1CMVT1BlgUnrc/iC7h2ZuJW1fBrt bNrC5hGZVOHQW5GHRop2h9jSCLn3QbqbOP/qw2hesxSz6kHTfP7aCBw640wjeaL2fB3aah OlrhAE0ZUGv3Ye6Kb1wFqOULSyGh3uzdtEPKQP4VxylQl0GE2D83DSE1mXFm42TzrDPBRL W61kikfkOKAHdbACpMLr1G/3WdfXuuTKYWf8JgJN4gpfTIMEPy1JxJU8AR+gmg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1637349217; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=dOHZOwjN1GUwgl5VEG9Y8339Dhjpp0jr9OOI1XWe4V1tcPkuMWjJ0GFO5yN/aXxRd/849M 9Kv6tyCErVo3YnQ9mwuqEsi5tp34bvmfzseYhLzY7bPx/M0nS5FLKFjJ68axGYNk93x1Su 7OwwjLYOWr7U7J6Yr9Eo7odIkP9RDTjt+awvJOqtTzOPlwvNS0YwaHxvD/6uznQhEYCtuM 13S0wwqFb++qFGI3w53Z94Mz7CwyW9v+bEa78/RVGY1fMuvT5tpDe7+aObbTqDIbvoCIKK UIGTHCKRJdI0pAJAkH6Bnj/VaYl5tXAgm+LXO0Xc0LWuQ4ryszZk536/aibDAg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=teulu.org header.s=default header.b=XZ2lTkbl; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.87 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=teulu.org header.s=default header.b=XZ2lTkbl; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: AAE318728 X-Spam-Score: -1.87 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: FV9UTk0Jzhid I ran into this problem several months back, so I re-installed with brtfs. No issues at all, and never looked back! On 16/11/2021 08:14, Jaft via wrote: > Oh, that's really cool. Good to know; I've never used anything outside of (ex)fat, ntfs, or ext4 and btrfs sounds interesting. I may have to play around with it more extensively, at some point. > Jonathan > On Sunday, November 14, 2021, 09:18:22 PM CST, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > Hello Jonathan, > > Em domingo, 14 de novembro de 2021, às 15:47:54 -03, Jaft via escreveu: >> Out of curiosity, I read that Btrfs requires periodic >> fragmentation; how often do you find yourself doing it and do you use >> any particular program for it (if you don't mind sharing, of course; I >> know it's not directly Guix related)? > I use btrfs for several years now — not with Guix System, though I do have > Guix installed on top of Ubuntu on btrfs so I do have /gnu/store on btrfs. > My experience is that it is zero-maintenance, at least on a personal laptop > workload. > > Btrfs has matured a lot over the years, so there’s a fair amount of > outdated advice still floating around on the Internet. You’re probably > thinking of the ‘btrfs balance’ command. In the past, it was useful to run > it every once in a while to avoid spurious ENOSPC errors. This problem has > since been fixed, and current advice is that regular use of “btrfs balance” > is now considered detrimental rather than beneficial since it puts more > load/stress on the disk without any practical benefit. >