From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Siddhesh Poyarekar Subject: Re: [X-POST] patchwork.sourceware.org refresh Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 22:29:49 +0530 Message-ID: <607b04dd-26d2-f049-94cc-660eb5d3fd47@gotplt.org> References: <78c774ef-9f9c-3339-aeb8-84636ee94360@gotplt.org> <87y2vnxbk2.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20191208122116.ae5wl4eytedt54vg@wittgenstein> <821c81bd-3c9a-0d33-ffbe-924de796dc7e@gotplt.org> <20191209165222.oanyqa7s73gzz6yd@chatter.i7.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20191209165222.oanyqa7s73gzz6yd@chatter.i7.local> To: Konstantin Ryabitsev Cc: Christian Brauner , Florian Weimer , GLIBC Devel , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, help-guix@gnu.org List-Id: help-guix.gnu.org On 09/12/19 10:22 pm, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > I'm not sure it makes that much sense to put glibc on > patchwork.kernel.org. I know we have some non-kernel projects there, but > they are pretty tiny and were approved largely because they wouldn't > make much of an impact on kernel.org infra. > > The same wouldn't be true for glibc, especially if we're talking bot and > CI integration. It really needs to stay on its own dedicated > infrastructure where it can be properly scoped and resourced. > > Sorry that I don't have a better answer. > I understand, thanks anyway. Siddhesh