From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carlos O'Donell Subject: Re: [X-POST] patchwork.sourceware.org refresh Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 20:05:59 -0500 Message-ID: <4dc01c09-74e9-c7b9-e07f-20931ffd12ce@redhat.com> References: <78c774ef-9f9c-3339-aeb8-84636ee94360@gotplt.org> <1277b1bb-c3c4-6fc8-a700-c7207efd31cf@gotplt.org> <87fti1cjor.fsf@tromey.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <87fti1cjor.fsf@tromey.com> To: Tom Tromey , Siddhesh Poyarekar Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , GLIBC Devel , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, help-guix@gnu.org List-Id: help-guix.gnu.org On 12/3/19 2:07 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Siddhesh" == Siddhesh Poyarekar writes: > >>> Or do you have something else, i.e. not just an upgrade, in mind? > > Siddhesh> To begin with, I intend to add hooks to close patchwork patches on merge > Siddhesh> so that that aspect is automated. It was the one problem we had with > Siddhesh> patchwork and with ChangeLogs gone in glibc, we're definitely a lot more > Siddhesh> likely to get close to that goal. > > For gdb, I'd like this to be much more reliable than it is today. We > were thinking we'd simply add a kind of patch-id to the commit message > -- the way we're currently doing with gerrit -- and then have patchworks > recognize this ID and use it as its internal key. > > I think this is not a very large amount of work in patchworks. That would be awesome. -- Cheers, Carlos.